The execute function can recognize it as a t-string and prevent SQL injection if the name is coming from user input. f-strings immediately evaluate to a string, whereas t-strings evaluate to a template object which requires further processing to turn it into a string.
Documentation (and press releases/FAQs) are usually for users. Specifications are for developers. The former can precede and help with forming the latter.
It's only not a valid point of criticism if you believe any level of wealth is justified as it must be proportional to that individual's contributions to society.
"Simple is often erroneously mistaken for easy. 'Easy' means 'to be at hand', 'to be approachable'. 'Simple' is the opposite of 'complex' which means 'being intertwined', 'being tied together'" - https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy/
This is also something I'm curious about, particularly how migrations are managed within a team. Most of the solutions I've seen require writing plain SQL in migration files which you name yourself. It's simple but I miss the productivity of DjangoORM or ActiveRecord for example.
Or do most people use a schema-less database?
And I bet most people can give you several. Can't remember the last time I bought a DVD or vinyl record, without having enjoyed it somewhere else first, for free.
I can't see the parallels between js/html and css/html. React disregards the js/html because they acknowledge that there never really was proper separation. With css/html, at least to me, it seems like there is a clearer separation. Maybe I'm being shortsighted.
Wikipedia gives an explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoda_conditions
Seems kind of meh, especially if you're writing javascript when keywords like undefined can be redefined with no effect.