It is not a repellent but seems to actively kill them/render them unable to fly [Metofluthrin (Pyrethroid)]
https://www.peacefulsleepsa.co.za/products/in-room-solutions...
3,223 karma · joined October 14, 2007
It is not a repellent but seems to actively kill them/render them unable to fly [Metofluthrin (Pyrethroid)]
https://www.peacefulsleepsa.co.za/products/in-room-solutions...
I can't come close to agreeing. The same minister pushing this, who is by his own admission semi literate and can't understand very basic concepts, has basically no understanding of technology (or indeed expertise in any area), has made no secret of the fact this is about censoring online speech he personally does not like[1]. He is a paid up yes man deep in the pockets of companies selling low effort AI solutions to governments for the purposes of enforcing speech[2] who wants, all said and done, to shut down twitter/X because people express opinions there he doesn't like. This has almost literally nothing to do with the old fashioned pearl clutching "think of the children". So much so he's going around holding anyone with reasonable opposition to this bill for child sexual assault, future, past and present[3]. This is obvious overcompensatory zeal. And it is week one.
What he has not done is engage earnestly with legitimate concerns about privacy and the bill. And he never will.
[1] https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/labour-peter-ky... | https://archive.is/Snw7y
[2] https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/we-need-to-talk-about-s...
A little naivety methinks. You should say rather
... the risk to micro-bloggers of £18M+ fines is, in reality, nil. ...should the bloggers not publish opinions contrary to the state and its current objectives.
For a start the vector is very different. And I don't doubt there are unknown other attacks. But I'm discussing attacks we know about because they put them in policy papers and legislation.
Absurd discussion
Is there a particular reason you don't want to discuss the EU working group which is what I posted in response to your comment.
I didn't even dive in to how your original comment doesn't make sense to me. How do you think the DSA would help or change anything regarding either.
https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/high-level-group-...
Define public data.
Which researchers will have access? Who decides upon them and what is their specific objective? Can I have access to it for my research?
> commercial meddling
What do you mean by this? Who is meddling and with what?
The user of social media has a personal engagement with that company. I don't think a government should be involved in that relationship. Why do you think it should?
Who are the researchers and what thesis are they exploring?
https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/dcl-social-behavio...
Then we have a very different understanding. And yes the post war heist that destroyed long term economic common sense all over the western world turned into a permanent ongoing shakedown
The article laments their removal as a tragedy and a removal of agency from the aggrieved party. If someone is "expressing themselves" they are communicating to others the things they consider meaningful in their life beyond an aesthetic choice.
> think the primary underlying motivation tying these changes together is aligning with the incoming administration.
Why were such policies implemented in the first place?
> “I know these examples are difficult to read — they sure are for me,”
Assumed victimhood is a cancer of modernity. And more cancerous is the benefit of that assumed victimhood to the people who make new people who encourage the adoption of niche identities learned from intersectional academia for their personal enrichment.
> One way Meta previously gave queer and nonbinary people a voice was to offer them custom themes for their Messenger chats.
If this gives your life meaning, you are worth ignoring.
Most people disagree with this deconstructivist view, therefore it is bad for business for a start. The enclosure of speech during the histrionics of covid NPIs was bad for society - a lot of which this policy is an admission of. People having an opinion on you coaching children to adopt gender roles so you can complain on the internet is bad for no one, except you.
Extremely common for kids to play this at least into the mid 2000s where i'm from, i moved away so i don't know if they still do
edit: can you not iterate design off a "Prototype 2d" node? it seems typing the "enrich" box makes a new adjacent node - i'd expect to beable to iterate off a design infinitely by creating child nodes. I can freely arrange the designs so i can write my narrative that way. Maybe at least have the iterative prompt recorded?
edit 2: sharing doesn't work - the url gives an empty workspace
My design: https://supercraft.ai/public_board?boardId=66c7de41614fe5ecb...
And for the most part interventions in Africa have caused cascading problems that ultimately lead to more human suffering. A complete failure to understand what and who Africa is.
Even Albert Schweitzer by the end had lost hope that it could survive at all without constant intervention.
I consider it genuinely insane to allow direct updated from vendors like this on large estates. If you are behind a corporate firewall there is also a limit to the impact of discovered security flaws and thus reduced urgency in their dissemination anyway.