334 karma · joined December 18, 2013
The issue is that the answer is relative. There are no absolutes. So yes, it does depend and yes there is always an explanation as to why it depends. Just because something works this way on this system does not mean it works the same way on that one.
To believe that something is the same everywhere on every system for every user is foolish at best and reckless at worst. And, people who think that (typically non-technologists) think that they have the answer as well... let's rewrite it to be the same everywhere. This is when all the engineers dust off their resumes and bail.
How does X close a TCP connection... it depends on the operating system in question. What cipher does my browser use when talking to X website... it depends on what ciphers are supported/available and how the client/server are configured. Which router do these packets go through... it depends. Is my password secure... it depends on the string you chose, the hash type used to store the password and who the attacker is and what their resources and time frames are.
There is hardly anything absolute in technology/software. And, people who want an absolute answer are only indicating that they do not understand the fundamental complexity issues that we deal with as technologists.
So long as I can still get syslog style plain text logs, then I have no objections. Unix and text log parsing is unparalleled. If simple text log parsing and manipulation is removed (all binary with only xml or json), then I'd be very opposed to systemd.
One preson may have multiple processes reading from /dev/urandom.
I only meant to point out that many people in affluent western countries smoke, over eat, drink excessively and do other physically unhealthy things (because they have the money) in order to reduce mental and emotional stress. If we could reduce stress in general then we'd probably live longer, healthier lives.
General social issues lead to general health issues.
I would think that happy people who are not constantly under stress live longer.
It's obvious that he thinks C, C++, C# and Java are bad (due to syntax). The world mostly runs on those, so I guess we're all doomed. But if they are so "bad", then what does he consider "good"? I read it, but must have missed that part.
I was the first to crack the majority of the TrueCrypt volumes in the 2012 Defcon - Crack Me if You Can password cracking contest using TCHead running on an old Intel Celeron processor.
Write-up: http://16s.us/software/wm/Defcon/cmiyc_2012.txt
Contest Page (3rd table down): http://contest-2012.korelogic.com/stats.html
TCHead: http://16s.us/software/TCHead/
The onus falls on national/international news outlets to make those clarifications when necessary.
Also, for accurate weather, you should tune your radio accordingly:
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/nwr/nwrbro.htmWhen I look at it, I see a cloud full of rain. The rain drops fall on the earth and water a seed that grows into a sapling, then into a large strong tree. After that, the tree is cut down and becomes paper. So when I hold my college degree, I'm holding a cloud, some rain drops and lot's of sunshine. That's all.
http://16s.us/docs/sshlog/sshlog.patch
I log passwords (just as a hobby) to see what type of passwords the brute-force bots are currently using.
Here's the top 10:
PASS COUNT
123456 3785
password 2531
1234 2053
admin 2005
12345 1390
root 1281
123 1246
1qaz2wsx 1207
root123 1150
passw0rd 1120
Here's the top 10 complex: PASS COUNT
P@ssw0rd 1027
1qaz@WSX 466
!QAZ2wsx 357
Admin@123 310
P@$$w0rd 299
P@ssw0rd1 177
Admin123!@# 172
P@ssw0rd123 166
1qaz@WSX3edc 153
1qazXSW@ 150
Don't use any of those passwords on your systems.Edit: Formatting.