1,217 karma · joined July 16, 2014
I think a better word is "respectful." You can be direct and blunt, as long as you're respectful.
Your reasoning about the allowances is backwards. If you lose a parent, an uncle and a grandparent all in one year, and get $22 million from each, then you have had a $66 million dollar "tax allowance". There's only one of you, but there are 3 deaths, so $22 million per death, ergo, a death tax. Conversely, if you work for 3 companies, you don't get to consider each income separately and pay only the bottom bracket of income tax for each of them; you pay the bracket that is appropriate for your total income, because it's an income tax, not a having-an-employee tax. (in the UK we also have a 'having-an-employee' tax, but that's handled separately).
If it really was an "inheritance" tax, then each person would have an "inheritance tax allowance", that is the amount they are allowed to inherit before the taxes start. So if 20 of my ancestors all kicked the bucket at once, each leaving me a modest fortune that adds up to a large total, then I would be liable for a hefty inheritance tax bill. Whereas, if great aunt Mabel died and left $1000 for each of her 1000 progeny, then no tax would be due, as surely a measly sum like $1000 would fall below any reasonable inheritance limit.
The "death" or "estate" tax is levied on the value of the assets of the person who died, not on the value of the amount received by an individual who inherits. Ergo, it's a death tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/1029...
[1] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/thai-man-films-...
In 2014 UK fishing boats landed 424ktonnes of fish into UK ports, while we imported 720ktonnes of fish, mostly from outside the EU.
#!/bin/sh
cd $1
shift
exec "$@"
It's a shame "in" is a reserved word, because that'd be a good name for it. Maybe "cde" for "cd-exec": tar c files | ssh dest cde /some/dir tar x that_function(i_know_what_im_doing=False)People simply aren't rational. It has been so hard for me to accept that.
find ... -deleteIf that were problem free, then fine. But it's not. Think of it as a symptom of an illness, and we should work to get the fever down.
The graph isn't logarithmic. It's shaped like this:
|
|
|
____________| tar tf filename.tar
tar xf filename.tar
tar xfz filename.tar.gz # Newer tars don't even require the z
tar cfz filename.tar.gz directoryname
Heck, surely even tar --help
would suffice.More interesting questions would be like: "which lower-case letters are NOT valid options to GNU ls". :)
Unexpectedly sinister.