395 karma · joined October 18, 2011
And they shouldn't have to, users should be able to install whatever software they want on their devices without paying a gatekeeper for it. Spotify exists on the web as well, they don't have to pay Google or Mozilla for delivering the service to their users. They don't have to pay Microsoft when users downloads and installs desktop software for windows. So why should Apple get any money because users install Spotify on their iphones? I'm sure Spotify pays Google for their cloud services that actually helps make them successful.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.26...
https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subje...
All current variants: https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs
for (let i = seedSteps + s.length; i >= seedSteps; i--) to for (let i = seedSteps + s.length - 1; i >= seedSteps; i--)
The original is not using the for loop in the usual way so i starts off one smaller than expected.
Apples seems to have that right, but some people are saying that they shouldn't have that right. Laws are possible to change.
I don't really see the point of pedelecs, unless you disregard the law and just pretend they are less powerful e-bikes. But then you'll lose it if the police notice.
The adhesion is greatest in the front of the contact patch where there is less slip and a wide tire has a wider but shorter contact patch, so it has more grip from adhesion.
If you keep the pressure in two tires the same, a wider tire will have the same contact patch area as a narrow tire since they will carry the same force and force is pressure multiplied with the area.
Which is precisely why they must be on a leash, always. Except in a fenced off area maybe.