342 karma · joined November 12, 2008
The Web is an ephemeral enterprise.That's why everything relevant has a DOI and not an URI.
Any sophisms detracting from that basic facts are criminally insane, or just criminal.
However, the points which he thinks are where Debian is stronger illustrate precisely where Linux has lost its way. Laptop support is lacking -- assuming you care about laptops, and care about suspend working out of the box. Guess what, suspend didn't work out of the box under Debian, either.
Storage, he's forgetting that zfs is both a filesystem, and a volume manager.
Support of alien file systems, really? Irrelevant for servers, for everything else mount it via NFS.
Virtualization -- between jails and Virtual Box (on desktops) what is the use case for a different product here?
Nothing like Dropbox -- that's not a bug, it's a feature.
Desktop environments need configuration -- why I am migrating from Linux, you think? If I already have to use alternative window managers and desktops on Linux, where is the big difference?
Package managers, now that is a good point. XML config, that too. Nigh everything else is missing the point.
> Now, I'm just not so sure. The feature creep here is remarkable.
Now you know why we had that acrimonious debate. This is precisely what was obvious right from the start.
Linux is Windows NT now, the only way to have a decent nix is to pick BSD.
If you're not showing plain text with JS off then you're bonkers, and I don't really need your site.
Doesn't matter that much if it's on a private network.
> Also, you double your licensing costs.
Not if the OS and virtualization solution require no license.
This is ideal cluster material.