73 karma · joined September 4, 2015
[1]http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-33786-4... [2]http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ahanda/VaFRIC/iclnuim.html [3]http://robotvault.bitbucket.org/
I think you maybe didn't give it enough time. What really happens after a while is that you don't have to do any mental effort to do very complex things fast and efficiently. My experience is that after three months I had some sort of clicking in my head and everything made sense.
Said that, I wouldn't mind Ctrl-D on vim though, that's one of those sublime's features that I really like (and non consecutive multi line editing).
Notable project: https://www.codeforlife.education/rapidrouter/ (developed by Ocado) and here's the github https://github.com/ocadotechnology/rapid-router. I've developed a couple of features and I have to say it has been a fun experience!
Incidentally I remember also reading [1] that in certain fields, in this case mathematics, most of the groundbreaking research comes from younger mathematicians. Great contributions to the field from people over 40 are extremely rare.
[1] Simon Singh, Fermat's Last theorem. Ok, not great source but still!
However, if you forget the job market, the argument the guy is making is absolutely spot on. There's a solid trend in academia that is "publish early, publish fast". Although one might argue that it actually makes sense (career-wise or whatever), it is intrinsic in such a system to penalise pursuing big, risky ideas. Considering that the PhD (and the few years after) are the most productive in a researcher's life, it is a shame that students are not actively encouraged to think bigger.
The way I see it, boredom is not a state in which you want to be, but rather the initial condition that triggers the need of doing things. One word that I think is related to boredom is passivity, hence I wouldn't associate thinking and introspection to a state of boredom as they require quite an active engagement.