Every two or three years I find myself with the need of carefully planning my next steps, so that my generalist pattern does not disrupt the advancement of my career according to the criteria of my environment, this is very tough at particular moments because sometimes you have less time available to work on your broad base and on the development of specific skills that are needed for some of its corners, but I still don't regret it.
Smile. Go for it blindly. Share the good news. Be extra kind. Be your best self even if you find it unrealistic. Go ahead, the path will clear for you.
I wonder if Discord will be one day a sort of "Twitter of Twitters" dealing with all these issues, with some servers focusing on Echo Chambers and other servers on either organized discussions or flame bait.
Thanks for improving my knowledge on how spellcheck works. Still, should I assume that a list of words cannot be kept? It sound to me like a naive assumption in the current landscape.
Last I read was that the meeting of ice in Antarctica is increasing the probability of extending La Nina (sorry I lost the source). There are theories about ENSO states becoming more frequent with climate change, the most favoured one was a more stable El Nino (see PNAS article by Lenton on climate tipping)
I find this outrageous. It also applies to the text of all of my employer' emails (at least those managed in the mentioned web browser), according to a prompt (with no option to reject, IIRC) I read the other day.
Edit: sorry I should have captured that prompt! I am not able to remember what it said, it might have been from the company rather than the browser.
Thanks for pointing me towards this fantastic book. About the review, it says nothing about Bach (once only) or Escher (just the figures), so how does it capture clearly or comprehensively the book?
IMHO this read like PR written against Mudge, I am not saying it is, I mean that the presentation of arguments and the logic is too visibly organised and does not feel balanced.
I fully agree with you, but perhaps for the opposite reason. For me the little detail is each tree, and the broad trend is what emerges from a large amount of trees and what they mean at Earth scale.
Yes but. Forget about simple linear relations. Where are those trees? What is their biogeochemical role? How change in them and the surfaces they occupy interacts with global dynamics in Earth system components? These are some of the questions that matter.
Since when are we using so many chemicals in soap and deodorants? Since when is soap the mainstream thing for washing the body? I am just curious, I remember an ecotoxicologist detailing the interaction of deodorants with hormons, it was pretty scary.
I suppose you are making fun of it. In case you need arguments to extend your joke: my friend and I were recommended pills made of colostrum of cow -- he took them.
There is a false feeling of security and absolute safety provided by this service. It is an illusion 99.99% of the times. There is another 0.009% when you are too far to get help in time. Then there is the 0.001 when you get lost in a canyon or harmed at rescue distance without cellular network -- the prominent case of that German family in a Canyon in California in a scorching day.