1,242 karma · joined November 4, 2013
These days you have shiny companies like PlanetScale and SingleStore implementing the MySQL wire protocol.
I guess it's up for debate and both things may be true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos_phone_hacking
- YugabyteDB is currently on Postgres 11.2 with plans to keep upgrading.
- Cockroach is not pinned to any Postgres version so its compatibility is reliant on their implementation. Not a bad thing, just different than YB.
- Like you said Timescale is in lockstep with latest Postgres (14 at the time of this comment) https://blog.timescale.com/blog/massive-scale-for-time-serie...
- Materialize is not really focused on scaling because that is not really what it is for, https://materialize.com/blog-roadmap/
- I might consider moving Spanner to the Somewhat compatible category. Lack of stored procedures and triggers makes it not a drop in replacement for those moving from Oracle/MS SQL https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/reference/postgresql/o...
- For native Postgres scaling strategies, we could call attention to Crunchy Data or Percona
Very nice to lay this out and I pretty much agree with the labels and categories on here. I would be you will get some people reaching out since Postgres compatibility is something these vendors compete on.
To me $11K seems pretty steep. But I might go for $5K to put Nature’s stamp on my work and have it open access.
- https://arctype.com/blog/sql-query-editor-switch/
- https://arctype.com/blog/indexeddb-localstorage/
Disclaimer: I wrote the 2nd one. My general takeaway is that it gets interesting quickly as the amount of text edited increases.
- https://arctype.com/blog/postgres-notify-for-real-time-dashb...
- https://heap.io/blog/speeding-up-postgresql-queries-with-par...
- https://blog.timescale.com/blog/how-postgresql-aggregation-w...
- https://blog.crunchydata.com/blog/understanding-postgres_fdw
Does anyone know what this refers to? Is it prosecutions of Chinese researchers in the US?