epolanski

I highly doubt those numbers, Leapmotor sells a lot of T03 and Bs and it's not even in the rankings.

Point is: those cars differentiate little to nothing among themselves except in design gimmicks.

The latest Grande Panda is an example of that.

Citroen is already the Stellantis' equivalent of Skoda niche for Volkswagen.

Why wouldn't they be able to grow, its just one data point more in their training, in your notes or in their instructions.

It doesn't matter if they are beings or not. They will replace most humans in the offices like machines replaced most humans in fields or industrial plants.

I already felt our civilization was on a steep decline, but AI is the final nail in the coffin, technology kills my own job too, hooray.

I keep hearing about this "when things break" argument, but things broke all the time with humans writing code too, if anything it feels like it's getting patched faster.

Look I loved our field, functional programming, etc. But the field as we knew it is dead, and if you think that your work is anything but providing new tests/edge cases and occasionally providing some guidance, you're in denial.

The US alone!

I think he means LLMs, we knew about RL already.

It's not balanced, the market keeps shrinking visibly.

There's CVs out there that would've made recruiters go mad 36 months ago sending their hundreth application.

Doesn't matter, if the number of position keeps shrinking so will our job prospects.

I'm a freelancing consultant since 5 years, I've had 2 major customers now for 3+ years. I have a very good pulse of the market: being good, or being even very good and being among those that brings AI and automation to organizations will not save our jobs.

In fact, AI has sped up so much the work that 2 out of 5 people in my current team are being let go: I find it absurd, our productivity has more than doubled over the last years and we've made ourselves redundant. Money is money, I'm on one side making non-tech workers redundant (people whose job was menial boring office stuff), and building the systems that will make myself redundant.

That's more of a "build a career", than "build wealth".

I run Deepseek v4.1 flash and pay per token.

I get more intelligence and mileage out of few tens of euros on their APIs than I would've got out of Codex+Claude 200$ subscription in June.

If you don't see the downward trend that's a you problem.

Is there anything "original" anymore when it comes to thumbnails or titles?

They are tweaked all time to maximize views.

Only one of the two trends is downwards.

Previous poster stated ai can't do hard problems.

Yet there's a typescript compiler vibe coded, 100% compliant.

Your comment feels like it was written 18 months ago.

A vibe coded typescript compiler runs twice as fast as the one maintained by two dozen people led by some of the most brilliant language and compiler experts out there backed by thousands of open source contributors.

All of that by saying "here's the tests, implement it in rust".

That and the fact that people void of any skills, coding or engineering ones, could still find a six figure job.

Programmers were all futurists, then the future came for their job.

Few years from now we'll be fighting to get a semi stable job that will pay like any other office job, and feel lucky we did.

Marketing is irrelevant.

Companies will keep using Google/Microsoft/Amazon cloud offerings due to the ease of extending existing contracts and procurements.

Virtually all my clients use Bedrock or Azure with zero data retention. Not one would use openai/anthropic or chinese cloud offerings.

Only devs do so.

> It's really not cheaper than frontier subscriptions.

I use DS 4.1 flash it all the time, i struggle to spend more than 1 euro per day on it, even working all day long.

DS 4.1 flash is much much better than Opus 4.6, even quantized.

Opencode Go for 8$/month feels like getting more intelligence and tokens than Claude in June 26 at the 200$ mark.

What are we arguing really?

An LLM has reimplemented a 2 times faster version of a program developed by a team of dozens of brilliant engineers led by few of the biggest experts in compilers and programming languages in the world.

While maintaining 100% test coverage and so far compiling every single project that the original compiler did.

If your takeaway here is "yeah, but the other one has been checked by dozens of paid devs and an entire community", and still those dozens of devs with the backing of thousands of contributors could not make a compiler faster I can't buy say: "maybe we humans aren't as good as writing code as we thought and LLMs are exposing us".

Because there's no evidence LLMs struggle to maintain or add features to complex codebases.

Your comment would've made sense in 2024, not now.

Either the current test suite covers the apis and expected behavior or it does not.

> Good luck adding new code to it.

Interestingly, your whole comment implicitly has the answer to this. In the future you don't add code or read it, you only add test cases and have the loops work on covering the new case.

I don't think the author even knows Rust.

> And how would you trust this to build your code?

In the same way you trust any build of the official compiler: it passes all of the existing tests.

Didn't expect folks to take a fact statement as an attack.

The point was to emphasize the longevity of some animals, as for us humans the US constitution is 8/9 generations away.