How many people are affected this time?
SolarWinds Orion exploit was the basis of the US government hack. Kesaya here is ransomware. Is ConnectWise next?
525 karma · joined June 2, 2021
How many people are affected this time?
SolarWinds Orion exploit was the basis of the US government hack. Kesaya here is ransomware. Is ConnectWise next?
Different people have different levels of access to ensuring media coverage, in part because of biases in those media outlets.
I am so confused by this argument.
I think you are right though that Bitcoin isn't acting like a currency, it is acting like an asset. Although it is highly speculative, more so that gold, as evidenced by its wild swings.
Bitcoin is a crypto-asset, not a crypto-currency.
Just because they ate meat? Maybe not, but they may not look kindly on those that did large scale killing with less than humane practices. I could see this individuals being more likely to be "Cancelled."
Maybe those that fought vegans or fought against animal rights activities?
Those opposing change for the better or were active participants in things we in the future see as bad.
Remember that most people cancelled were active participants, rather than passive bystanders going with the flow.
Given there is no intrinsic worth of BTC, rather just the collectively belief it is worth something, these incentives are very strong with BTC.
The problem is that if you look into it, it is a demographic battle to ensure that Israel keeps the West Bank and also that there is a Jewish majority in that region at whatever cost.
For example, here is a law that prevents family reunifications but only affecting non-Jews: https://www.adalah.org/en/law/view/511
And here is an Israeli ambassador making the case that Jews are reproducing more than Arabs and that is a great thing (although he excludes Gaza, which Israel hopes that Egypt takes over): https://www.jns.org/opinion/blinken-is-wrong-on-israels-demo...
Israel is a really strange nation these days. It is very racist and openly so.
Free upgrades if you already have a properly licensed Windows 10 I assume?
Interesting fact. These lawyers won a case against the guys who are suing you: https://sabety.net/2020/01/patent-troll/
Maybe worth engaging with them?
You likely can either do something more advanced or something less advanced -- if you have the choice do the more advanced solution as you are then likely pushing your product even further.
Fighting patents is for rich, established companies. You do not have the luxury.
You should change your product immediately to avoid infringement, or even close to infringing. If you do this you can avoid damages/claims against you.
Because you didn't know you were possibly infringing, you can avoid all claims/damages by immediately changing your product.
When you respond to them, you should say you didn't realize you were possibly infringing as you were not aware of the patent, you should say that you do not believe you were infringing, but anyhow you have modified your product to clear up any possibility of claims of infringement going forward.
You do not want to admit any guilt in anyway (actually the rule is NEVER admit guilt, always claim you believe you are not infringing), and you want to get away from these people because they are not worth your time.
But if you do need to use this tech, you should try to license it, but while claiming you are not infringing and there are alternative methods you can adapt. This gives you the most powerful stance. Make sure they understand you are very small and thus not worth dragging this out. Offer them something for a one time fee if possible and get than done and move on.
But avoiding the perception of infringing going forward is best.
"People El Salvador didn't get the $1200 checks that US citizens got from printing more USD, even though they both use USD in theory."
Are you seriously saying that 5% inflation a year, maybe a bit more worse case, is bad compared to Bitcoin just lost 40% of its value in the last 2 months? Oh no, better not use USD then and switch to Bitcoin!
Maybe we need a stable coin that is a mix of the major currencies if you are against USD in particular? It could be pegged to some ratio of Chinese, US, Euro (and UK or Japanese?) dollars? This would be quite nice and stable.
I question though why choose Bitcoin? I guess a lot of people support it. But it is far from stable, so no one in the right mind, especially poor people should hold significant Bitcoins because it is speculative rather than stable.
I guess stable coins do not have the wide acceptance that bitcoin has? Why not USDC or similar to solve the money transfer problem?
Your respond suggest that Bitcoin is going to the moon, but that suggests you want it to stay the speculative instrument it is now. But if it is going to work in El Salvador you want it to be stable no?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
That said, Bitcoin is almost purely based consensus reality for most of its existence. It is worth something because others feel it is worth something.
Then you have to fight against this by organizing better and more widespread. Sometimes I do worry that all this information on Fox News and others about bogeymen distractions us from trying to better the things we actually can.
It may be that we are too easily distracted / disorganized / disheartened to better our position. And then we will not better our position.
But if you believe you can not change your fate, then you definitely can not. So I do suggest being like Obama and starting with community organizing and solidifying ones position locally and taking that larger. There are effective strategies to engage in. But they are not watching TikTok or YouTube all day.
But I do agree you are correct that switching jobs every couple of years is an effective way of raising your salary often faster than if you stayed in the same place.
I believe that getting something for nothing is usually not sustainable. Just because you serve no purpose to those giving the things away for free. Something will give (some type of resource constraint will arise, even if it is just competitive/alternatives) and it will fail if you are not providing value.
You need to find a way to work hard such that your rewards are not capped artificially. Startups were you get equity. Large companies where you can progress to high salaries if you are able to rise. Starting your own business and being competent at it. Working on commissions in an area where the commissions can be large -- true sales, or real estate. Being a professional, e.g. doctor, accountant, lawyer, has traditionally had high wages and you often run your own business.
You need to work hard in a way that has unlimited rewards, or at least high rewards possible, and that aligns with your aptitudes.
You need to not work hard at a minimum wage job if you can get something better.
And if you are stuck in a minimum wage job, maybe you can organize with your fellow employees to demand better wages and benefits? This is also another way of working hard in order to get more for yourself.
Viewing decay graphics in this form is incredibly misleading.
So, while it may look good with the skeletons, notice they do not have useful demos, mostly just proof of concept demos that do almost nothing.