Many of our decisions are simply yes / no and this one as well, the claim it is much more then simple word is both right and wrong, right because there are many factors to the answer, wrong because there is a single answer for everyone. So just like:
Hillary or Trump.
PC or Mack.
NY or SF.
Internet explorer or Chrome.
Android or iOS.
...
One word summerizes all your understanding into a single decision to carry on.
Its ok to ignore because you lack the details as well.
I would leave the word AI out of it and focus on value. The value you suggest is not about asking but getting quick summary of activity per person/location.
This souds like an aggregator which can succeed but its pretty hard path. Main problem with aggregator is that there are no barriers - if you fail then nobody cares and if you succeed then competition will copy super fast.
The core observation you have is correct, I am missing the teak that will make significant barrier for competition.
Unless the Zuckerberg took his code or design this is false claim.We used to have a network for exchanging books in the university in 2001, it didnt go viral nor stolen by facebook.
Seeing good idea and making a great global product out of it is more then being the founder.
You allways care about competion, scale and market advantage or risk being copied .