216 karma · joined July 26, 2017
> It may be indicative of a health issue
Now you write:
> No study I've seen seems to suggest there's any problem with sleeping more up to something like 12 hrs/night I think
So he said it may be an indication of an issue, and you write that it may not be unhealthy to sleep a lot. Those are two different things.
As for your claim: A quick search returns many hits related to issues caused by sleeping more than ~9 hours. I have not reviewed them (I spent 1 minute on this) so can't say if the studies well performed. Example:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473367 "Prolonged sleep duration (night-time sleep and daytime napping) may be associated with an increased risk of dementia."
But saying that no study would even suggest there would be a problem seems strange considering I found a bunch of them in a minute. Maybe you have done a deeper review of the studies and concluded that they are invalid, or?
https://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/topics/jinja/index.html
What does this mean?
This was the opposite experience of my previous report where the bug was acknowledged 9 months later and then fixed another 3 later.
I wonder if it just depends on whether your report ends up in a escalation path with lots of busy people.
At least where I live there's rules against making money when home with kid (government pay you to be home with kid).
Otherwise pointy hair boss will bitch.
I have never had to sign a form to get healthcare here.
Azure Storage is a available in a ton of locations and all of them stopped working because Microsoft forgot to roll out their patch to renew the SSL certificate. So they knew about the issue but rolling out the patch was not done.
Another example was when they introduced HTTP2 for CDN endpoints and forgot to test the cipher list with popular browsers and broke compatibility with Firefox ESR.