HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

f00ber

-13 karma · joined September 25, 2014

submissionscomments
f00ber··on Bash 'shellshock' bug is wormable
Please give me an example of how somebody not running a Web server and a collection of CGI scripts is affected. A git server? Are you running one of these? Move on, nothing to see for most of us.
f00ber··on Bash 'shellshock' bug is wormable
Well, let these _admins_ worry about this. This is of no concern for the moment for a regular Linux or OS X user.

Now, an admin _must_ know every service running on entrusted boxes facing the Internet. CGI scripts hopefully are not common these days. If you run them do stop for other reasons.

So far every "attack vector" implies having shell access to the target machine in some form. No need to panic for majority of people.

f00ber··on Bash 'shellshock' bug is wormable
Oh stop this stupidity already. If you are not running a Web server that spawns bash when serving an HTTP request, then you are NOT vulnerable.

Are you running a Web server that uses CGI scripts written in shell or plain C that uses system() call? If you do, you have had other problems long before.

There are some grumblings about DHCP _client_ setups on Linux passing parameters via environment variables to shell scripts executed by bash, but I am yet to see this. This would be a problem, but probably easily fixable.

No need to panic or even patch anything (as always). If you running servers on your machine and allow inbound connections you should know exactly what those servers are and what they execute on behalf of external users.

This is NOT remotely exploitable.

It's an ad campaign for "security researchers" people.