f_devd

Agreed, I think the author has some self-selection bias.

Also from article:

> They were coping mechanisms for [my] preexisting problems: loneliness, family instability, social anxiety, ...

I would also suspect that some of those may be partially caused by second order effects of modern digital landscape. Even if we assume his own screen use is healthy that doesn't mean everyone else is the same.

It's pretty much required to make it work with large contexts, so probably not

Farmer advocates are not climate activists, surprisingly they have a negative correlation

> they can probably scrub through the data to find out whether there have been any mentions of the similar approach

They did check and it was in the trainingset but they could not confirm if it was the /cause/ of it, which is a bit of a cop out.

> no right to a trial before your rights of travel being revoked

I'm not sure what exactly this refers to (because of the paywall), but revoking right of travel before trial is fairly common, it the US it would be classified as detained without bail. And happens when there is a reasonable concern for flight risk before trial as seen by the judge.

How much time? Doesn't seem like the trend is reversing

It's not a single political front, they have members (those who sponsor hosting), they decide by vote

Unrelated citation?

Ngl the weird UI bugs made me think it must be made by AI, either that or the developer has very skewed frontend skills where gradients are fancy but sliders & interactions are broken.

> Chips?

Only ST, NXP, Nexperia, Osram, and a bunch more obscure ones. It's not a boom, but it's far from a wasteland

Inject some adversarial priming as is in actual usage, and you can probably get that number to >=95%

Because if you go down the callstack eventually you won't get the await keyword anymore; you'll get the actual 'waiters' and 'wakers' which define your scheduling

Except there is little cooling or power in space, depending on your position in orbit you could only have one of those at a time.

I think they mean that a non-observant visitor cannot tell the difference between both situations

Wouldn't be surprised if they have their own internal PBX system with a SIP trunk

That sucks, but also probably the best vindication for their strategy; any other mcu and you just wouldn't know.

Always a bit jarring to see a devboard stacked on an otherwise neat board. Looks promising though.

A UPS-style grid connected inverter (with phase balancing) would be significantly more complicated by also significantly more useful. More in the critical/specialized part category, rather than near-commodity (like MPPT/BMS)

There is no "who", once stabilizing institutions 'fall' the only remaining option is social pressure (which can come in various forms) but that does require a critical mass as it's very much reliant on network effects.

Having worked on compression algos, any NN is just way to slow for (de-)compression. A potential usage of them is for coarse prior estimation in something like rANS, but even then the overhead cost would need to carefully weighted against something like Markov chains since the relative cost is just so large.

> Isn't it the employees' responsibility pay for their union membership?

No, contributions are handled by the employer/company

One likely source: https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/17/sam-altmans-worldcoin-beco...

Remind me to never look at twitter replies again, by far most counterproductive threads I've seen

No, it's gc-like. Up to 4x slowdown iirc

Where do you detect malice? The claims are quite accurate.

> I have no idea why I should be against using LLM

It highly depends on your own perspective and goals, but one of the arguments I agree with is that habitually using it will effectively prevent you building any skill or insight into the code you've produced. That in turn leads to unintended consequences as implementation details become opaque and layers of abstraction build up. It's like hyper-accelerating tech-debt for an immediate result, if it's a simple project with no security requirements there would be little reason to not use the tool.

I never started for similar reasons

I have the same with journals, but the video archiving has actually come up a few times, still fairly rare though. I think the difference is that you control the journal (and so rarely feel like you need it's content) while the videos you're archiving are by default outside of your control and can be more easily lost.

I would a agree a careful and very small amount of above brainrot in post-training could improve certain metrics, if the main dataset didn't contain any. But given how much data current LLMs consume and how much is being produced and put back into the cycle I doubt it will miss be missed

A more modern approach of doing the same to use polymerized quantum dots (I believe it emits wide spectrum white when a voltage is applied), and passing that through a quantum dot film to get any specific wavelength.