fewer mathematicians means fewer problems to solve. All problems have human origin, right? Can AI create a problem on its own and what would be the point? Closer to can god create a stone he can't lift.
the tab era was the right mix for me. I retained all the mental context of what was going on and I could quickly ascertain if it had made a mistake. they just killed cmd+k for who knows why. Everything is agent or nothing 'easy' button slot machine pulls.
if you take yourself out of the loop it will hurt your skills and career. Engineering blogs used to have some best practices you emulate, but the big ai companies you cannot mimic without their infrastructure
aren't mathematicians needed to create the problems? Everything solved so far is a question posed by a human. Which is probably why cracking diseases is more difficult (apart from man made viruses :/)
they deprecated the old layout which I very much preferred in open code desktop. I'm never in a rush so I'll wait for the early adopters to vouch for this release.
flooding the system with parts that may be incorrect hurts the whole process and will get people to tune out (like politics). Can't see the International Mathematical Union making a similar mistake because it would do reputational harm. But the models don't care about their reputation. Bad for the layman - like me - to know what to make of all this.
reminds me of the TOS episode of South Park. By Checking this box you forfeit your millennium prize solution and may be turned into a human centipede at future date.
indie hacking seems dead-ish because everything can just be cloned instantly, and if you don't have a serious go to market plan with a latent user base you're SOL.