filed

It means prepare for the right to deny services to the left. Right owned companies.

Prepare for power to be used against you when we have it. AG, president, senate, regulatory agencies.

I'm so glad you agree with me. So you are okay then with truckers refusal to deliver food to lefty run cities.

Awesome we agree!

So just be prepared to be treated how you are treating the right. Lefty company bans ppl on the right, then we have the moral obligation to ban ppl on the left from our businesess.

So maybe the problem is gov power and which companies are doing their bidding.

How about no. Not when we are under attack.

Dude Joe Rogan voted democrat.

Spotify is a left wing activist company. Just like Airbnb and GoFundMe.

Conservatives are dropping their principles- meaning why should we give the left free speech or services from private companies when they deny that to the right. We want revenge. We want AG from GOP states to investigate these companies for fraud, theft, or discrimination.

They are no longer a neutral company. Period, and this is war.

Conservatives can no longer expect services from lefty companies.

How about truckers, who are conservative, not deliver food to lefty cities. How will they like that. So now lefty's need to start their own lefty trucker companies so they can get food. It is a private business, go start your own trucking company to get food- how do you like that?

If I could steal 325 million dollars and get away with it I would.

From Nate Hochman on the embarrassment at Georgetown Law after a struggle session to address Shapiro’s tweet-

‘ Me @NRO : At the Georgetown sit-in this morning, Dean Treanor apologized profusely for "betraying" student "trust" by hiring Ilya Shapiro, and promised to "do better." Student activists demanded everything from reparations to free food to "a place to cry."’

I wish there was a way to connect law firms or attorneys in states where you can read the law or become an apprentice with those wanting to become a lawyer without law school. I know there are only a few states, CA being the big one.

Yep it is horrific. Where are the asians.... If blacks are going to complain they aren't at tech companies in sufficient numbers then whites and asians have a right to demand they aren't in NBA in high enough numbers.

If colleges can discriminate based on race, then everyone and every business should be afforded the same privilege.

Meaning, there should be no diversity quotas, mandates, or accusations of racism, even if there are hardly any minorities employee at a business.

It is this double standard that no one likes.

If Harvard wants to admit only blacks for 2025 let them, but stop telling companies in CA they need at least 1 non white on the board or that there aren't enough blacks in tech.

If you don't agree that everyone should be treated the same, then we have to go by race protections and colleges are discriminating.

What is next, mandating you date a minority if you a white?

Legacy is usually a family that donates or at least a well known family so admitting the family member for donations or clout seems to me like admitting a football player on scholarship who will win games but not good academically?

These situations are few and sort of cancel each other out- they don't matter... what matters is how the other people are let in.... and ivy league has a reputation of being very gifted minds (high IQ measured through SAT). Ultimately unis have discretion to some degree... but race happens to be protected. I think it's the large difference in scores by race that cause problems. And if you think it's unfair bc of upbringing.. how is putting them in with way more gifted students the answer--- unless ivy league is now just a signal and not a learning institution? If so it's time is limited.

I actually think these ivy leagues are just operating under woke capitalism- the more elite blacks (the best blacks with the highest SAT scores) they let in the better their clout right now- even if whites or asians have higher scores--- that is bc race is the only thing that matters right now. This transfers to hiring too- so the blacks that go to Harvard today are probably worth 100X any white or asian. At least politically... which is where power resides.

Perhaps that means that the issue is deeper. It isn't just okay to discriminate against whites and asians. Blacks are a rare commodity, at least ones that can succeed at Harvard and the ivy leagues want to make sure they get as many as they can. What though does that tell us of the importance of race and who is being worshiped just bc of their skin color?

Public vs private- I mean they both are tax exempt. One takes more in tax dollars.. so what? Do we have more control over the public school- not really.

Time to challenge affirmative action or raced based hiring or discrimination of whites in the job market as well.

Certain groups are getting truly resentful of groups that benefit from this blatant discrimination.

Where are the lawsuits? A lot of people induced to buy crypto as investment that will be sued for fraud.

What good are security cameras if they still will not prosecute.

We all have property rights, even businesses believe it or not.

Theft is a violation of property rights.

If you don’t believe in property rights then I’ll take the keys to your house- thanks

What will bitcoiners do when the inevitable happens- inflation and green energy polices raise the price of electricity...

I guess they can pick up and move somewhere if it gets banned. In the meantime they can partner with green energy, raising electricity prices or cost to mine bitcoin which helps push up the price of bitcoin. All while pretending to be green- encouraging wind expansion and hoping for blackouts which they can also profit from - wild swings in prices makes them also enron energy traders.

This will encourage more POW coins... lets launch even more tokens with POW.

Releasing stats on race of renters and which race has the most problem renters would help ease fears... if the stats show that all groups behave the same on the whole and there is no financial motivation to be biased. Or if there is a difference then Airbnb could say if anything bad happens to your home then we got you.. then you wouldn't be afraid of anything.