finnn

ah yes, another fork of BirdSiteLive. Every one seems to make their own fork of that thing. And none of them (that I've found) set a user agent when delivering messages to other AP servers.

You can see where bird.makeup sets the headers here[0] (with a distinct lack of user agent) and an issue I filed against the upstream[1] asking them to please set a user agent.

[0] https://git.sr.ht/~cloutier/bird.makeup/tree/master/item/src...

[1] https://github.com/NicolasConstant/BirdsiteLive/issues/188

oh wow HN is parroting this bullshit again.

Moxie and Signal didn't do anything other than asking LibreSignal politely to stop using their servers. They didn't "shut down" anything, and they have shown no interest in shutting down signal-cli/signald.

MobileCoin, the cryptocurrency that Signal incorporates and essentially sanctions, uses signald for their bot[0].

the Signal Matrix bridge has hundreds if not thousands of open source users, plus Element One and Beeper users, all using signald and not having any repercussions for years. The only 3rd party Signal client that's caught any flak from Signal that I'm aware of is LibreSignal.

also see: last time this came up[1]

[0] https://github.com/mobilecoinofficial/mobot/blob/dev/RUN.md

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27682490#27683374

Could you point me to some of those instances?

Okay, that's fair. I interpreted them as a response to the original question about if the policy is enforced.

We know the policy, no one is confused about the policy, all 3rd party clients violate the policy.

Is the policy enforced? I've seen no evidence of it.

I'm looking for people's experience interacting with the Signal server, not moxie. We're talking about if the server enforces any kind of client restrictions.

I haven't looked super deep, but to the best of my knowledge that's not something that happens really. I looked through that reddit thread (thanks for that BTW, whisperfish seems interesting) and skimmed over that enormous GitHub thread, but I couldn't find much in the way of people actually experiencing issues interacting with the Signal server. Again, would appreciate it if you could link me to such a thing. As I mentioned elsewhere, I maintain an unofficial signal client and I try to be aware of these sort of things.

Sorry what am I looking for in this 200 comment reddit thread? I don't see any comments from moxie himself, just a lot of other people claiming to know what moxie wants. Are there reports of specific issues with 3rd party clients or comments from a Signal employee or something?

signal-cli uses a clearly identifiable user agent [0] that could easily be blocked if Signal wanted to. signal-cli could escalate by trying to evade that kind of a block, but as it stands signal-cli has been operating without trouble for several years.

I meant they may ask some clients not to use their servers, but they don't have any enforcement mechanism in place beyond asking them to stop on github.

[0] https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli/blob/05abb3f9f6294677d2d...

I said it's not enforced.

I cannot speak for moxie or Signal. I can speak for my own experiences, as the maintainer of a fork of signal-cli, and I have never seen any evidence that Signal's servers block signal-cli or my fork. I don't know about signal-cli but my fork clearly identifies itself in the user agent (and another field called the "signal agent") to the server. If they wanted to block me they could.

edit: signal-cli also sets a user agent clearly identifies itself: https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli/blob/05abb3f9f6294677d2d...

It's not a licensing restriction, it's a terms of use for their network service. It's also not enforced. Their clients are open source, signal-cli uses a fork of the Android app's client library.

signald is a fork of signal-cli

yes, send it to your own phone number, just like all the real Signal clients.

there are matrix bridges for all three of those

https://github.com/tulir/mautrix-whatsapp

https://github.com/Half-Shot/matrix-appservice-discord

https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-slack

signald also comes with a cli called signaldctl: https://signald.org/signaldctl/

the signal matrix bridge currently listed on matrix.org (https://github.com/tulir/mautrix-signal) uses signald

a pidgin (libpurple) plugin actually exists already: https://github.com/hoehermann/libpurple-signald

I'd like to improve the website to better showcase the clients

This daemon handles as much of the weird signal-specific stuff and exposes an easier to use API. It handles things like encrypting and decrypting messages, generating and storing keys, syncing with linked devices and a bunch of others.

signald doesn't really "trigger actions" or anything, but it would be pretty easy to write something that does using it.

:)

well "signal-cli" is already in use by https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli (which signald is a fork of)

This is a tool to build Signal clients with. It handles the Signal-specific stuff, clients can communicate with via a unix socket.

signald author here, open to suggestions on that name. As you've noticed, I try to avoid using the word "signal". I do agree that the current name is pretty awkward.

edit: the name for signaldctl. I'm not looking to rename signald at this time

https://gitlab.com/thefinn93/signald/-/issues/52#note_406669... has some details about the issues running Chatty with libpurple-signald

Sounds like you're describing an SRV recrod

Don't forget that you get that $4.99 credited back to your account on first use.

imgur converts to the most widely supported formats. This is not a community issue.

A brief look around the supervisor site indicates that they have public version control and issue tracking on their github page[0] and that they have a merged PR[1] to add python 3 testing (which appears to be passing).

[0] https://github.com/Supervisor/supervisor [1] https://github.com/Supervisor/supervisor/pull/901

How is this concerning? This is very good, because it makes it easy to do that, which means that's much harder to dismiss as "something that will never happen".

In case anyone's wondering more about how that store did that, here's the docs: https://developers.google.com/beacons/

Which DMVs require fingerprints?