fireattack

The complement of "building its own video-transcoding chips " isn't just software encoding though. Google/Youtube could have already been using hardware encodings, just with generic GPUs or whatever existing hardware.

Interestingly burrito.catering used to be a thing it looks: https://web.archive.org/web/20180804010349/http://burrito.ca...

Just curious, could you just put the address for Finder into that hook instead of the auxiliary program? Or even better, just put the main MPQS program?

>A headline with 5G but not a single mention of it in the article.

There is.

>He added that Apollo would allow the business to grow, a more difficult prospect when it was operating within Verizon, which was planning to spend even more money to expand its next-generation 5G wireless network.

Seriously. I honestly don't mind to have "sign up" being more prominent, but see very little reason why they go further and hide login button..

But Canada mainly uses letter instead of A4 IIRC (correct me if I'm wrong, not Canadian myself).

Downvoting pattern on HN is the weirdest thing, even weirder than Reddit sometimes.

I can feel what kind of the comments will be downvoted but can't pin down why. The best I can come up with is that certain comment will be downvoted when the "mood" (not even narrative) of it doesn't fit with the others.

I think junk food place in general is actually more hygienic.

It seems to require a lot more effort than traditional lumber and can't really be mass produced. I doubt the output/input ratio (whatever you consider as the input: man-hour, monetary cost, carbon footprint) is any better either.

In other words, I think it's more like a luxury, and I won't call luxury items "sustainable".

The technique is definitely cool, but can it really be called "sustainable"?

Similarly, I primarily use calibre-debug CLI to extract resources from ebook.

Just curious, why not just show numpad/pattern input all the time then?

Still sounds weird to me. I use an Android phone, I can unlock my phone at anytime using either face, fingerprint, or passcode.

What exactly is the reason/rationale that it has to fail on facial recognition first before proceeding to use passcode?

I always thought the meme/joke is more about McFlurry than your standard ice cream.

I personally never encounter ice cream machine broken either.

Agreed.

However, I think there is another issue in the US: last mile transit.

Even if the US magically have the rail system similar to China today, using it in cities like Houston etc. that has poor public transit would still be a pain in the ass in practice.

If date info is critical in your search, I suggest to use the Tools->Custom range instead of `before:`/`after:`.

They are almost identical but if you use Tools one, it shows the date of each search results directly on listing, which is very helpful.

So ARM nowadays is just straightly better than x86?

I was always taught ARM (and M1), being a RISC architecture, isn't as "capable" as x86 in some way, whatever it means.

I am no longer sure if that's still the case, since they seem to work just as good, if not better (energy efficiency). Of course, it's not exactly an apple to apple comparison since Apple upgraded so many other things, but I just didn't see any mention about the limitation of being RISC in these articles.

Could someone enlighten in this respect for an average Joe who knows nothing about hardware?

But does it have the problem GP is describing?

If not, I'd say it's definitely better than his/her MacBook Pro since they're at least functioning.

The article is directly mentioned in OP's link.

BTW, that scrollbar though..

I honestly never find that folding technique better than just.. fold it thrice using the exactly same three folding lines:

https://i.imgur.com/CRxFYwS.png

The end result is identical, not really slower, it's easier to adjust the "proportion' during the process, and it works better with long sleeves with minor adjustment.

Totally unrelated to this great project, but I'm curious: do people really use content-aware resizing feature in practice?

I use Photoshop frequently, and I use content-aware removal A LOT (super handy). But it never occured to me, not even once, that I need to use the content-aware resizing despite it's there for years. If I really need to change the ratio of an image/photo I usually just crop.

Personally I think absolute number of admitted students is a more useful metric, since you can't really control how many people apply, and your capacity is more or less fixed.

From the graph in the article, that is also in decline, but not as sharp (except the outlier of this year, which is caused by other factors).

Sound is default on here (it does need some time to load, though).

It must be something Mac specific.

It runs very smoothly on Chrome + Windows with a dated computer.

I mean seahorse is actually easy. I knew it can't be Pokemon because it's a real animal.

I think there is a fundamental difference between the two groups about how much simplification/inaccuracy can be accepted.

The TV producer would take 90% fact, 5% oversimplification, and even 5% misleading info all day every day.

The experts probably won't accept that. This is not to say they are unable to simplify things (which as you said, is a very crucial skill on its own) if asked, they just won't go ahead and actively publish anything that way.

I personally side with TV producers here as soon as they have good intention. But can see why other people think otherwise.

I can see both sides. I appreciate these documentaries for raising awareness as you said.

The reason why experts don't "try to explain it to us" probably is exactly because they think it's complex and nuanced. They probably don't even think there is an "issue" that need to be explained to begin with.

Think it this way: you're in a field, and you know its pros and cons. You are not going to randomly speak anything about it because that's just.. like everything else in the world. Now, suddenly someone, likely an "outsider", wrote an article to describe the field/area in a certain one-sided way (good or bad). Of course you now suddenly have a strong opinion on it.

Note: above is about the common question I saw "why these experts only appear to refute others but never explain the thing themselves", not about Seaspiracy in particular.

Does anyone test its completeness, especially for the older date?

Also, i can't seem to be able to download the actual data (only the matadata), it says "Files marked with [lock icon] are not available for download." at https://archive.org/download/archiveteam_twitter_20210316071....

What is "high-bro sphere"? I googled and didn't find anything.