fjdlwlv

She was a falling start before joinging Yahoo, having been demoted from.her previous senior VP role

The comment above is false, it if ignores the value of equity. Fortune was pushing a bullshit sexism narrative. Mayer made 10x in equity what McInerney made in salary

Yahoo hired her after she got demoted from senior leadership at Google. They got her on her way down, and vice versa.

The CEO of Alibaba decided that Alibaba would give away half of its assets to the CEO

Galileo's wasn't held back by religious intervention against science.

Even debates about heliocentrism weren't interfering with math.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/ does what you describe

7 grains, at least 3 high

All of taxonomy is pattern matching unless you have something like kennel clubs or Mormons tracking individual genealogy​

This patent is 3 years old, obviously a "patent every idea you have" filing, and nothing in the story supports the headline "secret".

This story has no value.

Those ads are very expensive to place on the page and have lower inventory. Aka less efficient than popular ads

When the news originally hit, it was estimated that some number of air-quality related deaths were attributable to ait pollution contributions

Seems like the "organic" fad was the problem

The Atlantic stopped publishing serious research article several years ago.

The two examples you​ list are personal essays/confessions

You confessed to several violent offenses in your first post

When did you stop being a psychopath? Were you aware of the change?

So, in practice, white people in rehab, black people in prison? That's what we do now. See the Reagan era disparity in cocaine vs crack punishment

14% is huge, especially considering how many people commit crime because their life was destroyed by a drug conviction (their own or their parent's) leading to further crime.

Your math is wrong, rayiner didn't mention neighborhood variation at all, and Simpson paradox is relevant to changes over time or resampling, not simple rate comparisons

America was hateful and racist back when voters were all rich Anglos too.

Big telecom companies like Verizon, who make their money by hijacking public infrastructure and then renting access to it, oppose net neutrality.

No, Internet.org Free Basics is Facebook paying people's data costs for traffic to Facebook services, akin to Amazon giving out Amazon gift cards. It isn't preventing anyone from buying other traffic at standard destination-neutral rates, or privatizing a publicly-financed utility.

FCC's job is to make and enforce policy that conforms to the law set by Congress, not to hold and obey public votes.

What does spam have to do with the FCC's decision making?

Nothing.

Comments are for submitting ideas. It was never supposed to be a popular vote.

You said yourself that putting the second foot down doesn't increase stability. It's a paradox.

Why not both?

Sorry, Ringo :-(

Yes.

Still looks a little competitive. Not everyone is wealthy enough to travel.

It was confusion about whether "workout" is the same as "work out"

D is for disorder. People who say NT are people who challenge the claim that Disorder is appropriate terminology. Instead of an "order/disorder"distinction, they draw a "typical/diverse" distinction.

NT isn't quite neutral -- nothing ever is -- it's an intentional removal of the bias that the center of the bell curve is superior.