flexagoon

I was just using the terminology of the person I was replying to

Not gonna argue about the utility of AI, but isn't the statement "AI is not here to help people" completely meaningless? AI itself is not "here" for anything; the problem is big tech doing big tech shit as always, not the current technology they're doing it with.

The huge energy waste is from model training, not inference

You can just use one line of JS instead

https://fxgn.dev/blog/anubis

> you need to run it on your own machine

Isn't that the best part of codecrafters? Being able to just use your own text editor instead of a janky web based one which loses everything you typed on page refresh?

All the results for "e os" are about /e/OS, and that's its full name, so you wouldn't just search for "e". D language is a better example — its just called "D", but searching for that doesn't give results about the language. On the other hand, for "C" and "R" the top results are all about the languages. "Go" is also a pretty bad one, they insist it's not called "golang" but you basically have to search for that to get any useful information.

No no you just don't get it, they haven't released one because it's too dangerous and a you're not allowed to have access to it for your own good!

If you're calculating time that a task took by subtracting two UTC datetimes instead of just using a monotonic timer or at least unix timestamps, you're doing it wrong either way

The only better thing is the organization being called "International Earth Rotation Service"

Independence from a country doesn't require excommunication of all citizens of that country

Dutch researcher salaries are also pretty high (compared both to median Dutch salaries and academic salaries around the world), so it's still not like you're leaving USA to live in poverty

Unlike now, where instead of saying your hypothesis you're just letting every reader come up with what they think is a crazy conspiracy theory and ascribe it to you?

There is a tag for ALPRs on OpenStreetMap:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surveillance:type%3D...

So you can just add them using a normal OSM editor like EveryDoor or Vespucci

No specific figures, but see, for example:

https://annas-archive.gl/blog/ai-copyright.html

> Virtually all major companies building LLMs contacted us to train on our data. Most (but not all!) US-based companies reconsidered once they realized the illegal nature of our work. By contrast, Chinese firms have enthusiastically embraced our collection, apparently untroubled by its legality.

> We have given high-speed access to about 30 companies. Most of them are LLM companies, and some are data brokers, who will resell our collection. Most are Chinese, though we’ve also worked with companies from the US, Europe, Russia, South Korea, and Japan. DeepSeek admitted that an earlier version was trained on part of our collection, though they’re tight-lipped about their latest model (probably also trained on our data though).

It's at least 30 companies, each of which paid hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I don't think it is. It reads exactly the way I would write it myself.

No, but they openly make a lot of money from selling their library to AI companies. Fast enterprise access to Anna's Archive starts at $100.000

Idk, I get what you mean but I'd personally rather not use my pinky finger for navigation, sounds really uncomfortable.

I don't believe that you actually see no difference between this and the case in the lawsuit.

How are they "not that touch-typing-friendly" when they're literally the keys that are always under your fingers when touch typing?

I just have a layer on my keyboard that puts arrow keys where hjkl are on qwerty when I hold the tab key. Since tab is right next to my pinky finger on my laptop, it easily became muscle memory, and allows to use home row navigation in all apps, not just the ones that support hjkl.

If someone has the time and opportunity to create a robot vacuum from scratch, they probably also have the time to write a short introduction for it

Child mortality rates are rapidly dropping globally as well

https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality

https://ourworldindata.org/children-saved-global-health

> Submitters just add stylistic markers to make their accounts and output seem human-generated

https://xkcd.com/810/

I've had a Bellroy bag, they're not the most fashionable but super high quality and well thought-out. Just like Haskell code—maybe that's why they like it.

Everyone dreams about making the next cool AI tool and doesn't bother checking if someone has already made the same thing years ago without the word "AI" in the description

For even more of a challenge, try replicating Richard Stallman's personal setup:

https://stallman.org/stallman-computing.html

"Don't believe random quotes on the internet"

- Albert Einstein

Heliboard does have swiping! You just have to manually download the GBoard swiping library and upload it in the app.

> Exactly same reason why porn sites use their own specialist payment processors

They're called high-risk payment processors and they usually handle all sorts of "legal but sketchy" sectors like porn, gambling, crypto, legalized drugs/vapes, MLMs, etc. It's not even some shadowy darknet industry, if you just search for "high risk payment processor" there is plenty of them which look very professional and even provide official Shopify integrations and stuff.

Interesting that if you go to one of their websites they also handle some pretty normal industries like "furniture" or "travel" just because of the high chargeback rate in them.

Because it offers cheap open source models, not GPT and Claude. I mentioned it as an alternative to Z.ai's subscription in OP's comment, not to Codex.