3,028 karma · joined September 24, 2010
Thanks for taking the time! I love these guys. They are definitely way more useful in that they are general-purpose. What we're doing is much more specific, and the results are very different. Try both and compare!
I have no doubt we'll soon get taken over by general-purpose systems. But for now, all we do is deep research to find competitors, and the results are for sure much better with us for that narrow use case.
I got sick of starting a project only to later discover significant competitors or features of the marketplace I missed, despite looking. I can now do in minutes what used to take me days.
Rules: Allow nested .cursor/rules directories and improved UX to make it clearer when rules are being applied.
This has made things a lot easier in my monorepos.
Getting that kind of money from a big corporate job, I would guess, is a lot more hassle-ridden than if you did it on your own. I also think the competative context is important to understand.
I actually have been experimenting with a tool[] I made to very quickly get an understanding of just how competative the marketplace is for a particular idea -- big or small. I have a million ideas, prefer the "smaller" ones, and prefer to enter where there is a real market opportunity.
Now though, things are different. After a throw away project to get back into things, I realized I could very nearly just build first and find product market fit second if only because building is sooo much quicker now.
I decided that over the course of a year I was going to try building 3-6 separate projects, and assume at least one will be successful. My most recent project I realized very late that it's probably going to be very hard to ever make much money; so for now, I'm giving it away for free, just to see how people use it (https://seikai.tv).
I've not just started a new project and for sure this one is going to be a unicorn!
If anyone is still paying attention, email me at hi@seikai.tv and I'll see if I can send you one.