It’s true that satire is not always bad. But I dislike that they don’t make it obvious that this article is satire. It wastes people’s time who actually take it seriously (as we can see by the other HN comments). Or if it’s serious, then why is it on a satire site? They need to pick a lane and be clear about it.
I dislike the sense of judgment from TSA officials when I don’t correctly predict which items they do/don’t want me to put in the tray. It’s not my fault that different airports seem to have completely different rules for the same items.
The vast majority of developers have 0 need for learning SIMD. Why mislead them, and make them feel like to be a "real" developer they have to know it?
I don’t think saving them from spying is the main concern. Instead it’s the direct negative effects of the usage upon the kids that’s the concern. Not that age verification isn’t problematic
Then why did curl only find one new vulnerability thanks to Mythos, and a low-priority one at that? It’s clear that other models are quite capable of finding largely the same vulnerabilities, and that the main key is simply running a frontier model in a good harness to find vulnerabilities.
This isn’t moving beyond fork and exec at all. It’s adding a complicated API for a marginal gain for a niche use case, and ignoring the actual big bottleneck of fork
I just vibe code the html and css. I review the JS, but I figure if the flow of data is correct, I can just verify the html/css code through manual testing
This seems quite over engineered. They could’ve just left their phone recording overnight and done much simpler analysis on the big file. Maybe leverage LLM to write a 20-line python script, at most
One thing I’ve been wary about with Rust for CUDA is the bit of overhead that Rust adds that is usually negligible but might matter here, like bounds checks on arrays. Could it cause additional registers to get used, lowering the concurrency of a kernel?