Disclaimer: I'm a former core contributor to blueflood.
597 karma · joined September 3, 2010
Blog: www.jamesburkhart.com Email: hn@hip.st Twitter: www.twitter.com/jburkhart
Disclaimer: I'm a former core contributor to blueflood.
http://mikebeauchamp.com/misc/sennheiser-hd-555-to-hd-595-mo...
Re [1]: How would you expect the presentation layer to present >n data points using n pixels?
Graphite doesn't "change your data". Presentation of data != the data itself, just as a map of a city != the city itself.
To answer your question, I think it largely depends on what a player does in-game. A young player running a lucrative in-game business is indicative of something very different from, let's say, if they spent their time scamming others or were primarily involved in combat ops.
If you're looking for similar electronic music sets, here are a couple I've been digging lately:
Kaskade's set from Coachella, soundboard recording. http://www.themusicninja.com/live-set-full-kaskade-coachella...
Porter Robinson's BBC Essential Mix - http://soundcloud.com/edmtunestv/porter-robinson-essential-m...
Knife Party's BBC Essential Mix - http://soundcloud.com/edmtunestv/knife-party-essential-mix-l...
Luvstep 2.5 (There are several other mixes in this series, though this one is my favorite) - http://soundcloud.com/dirtysouthjoe/luvstep-2-5
Straight Bass to the Dome - Coletrain http://soundcloud.com/cberra88/straight-bass-to-the-dome
It's sad to me, because there are so many much more worthy things for us to aspire towards, as software developers, than some stereotype based around degenerate behavior.
More details on the modification process can be found here: http://mikebeauchamp.com/misc/sennheiser-hd-555-to-hd-595-mo...
> cmd+l, cmd+c, cmd+t, sna, <down-arrow>, enter, tab, cmd+v, enter, right click generated image, copy link
As opposed to (skitch keybinds): > cmd+shift+5, click once in my browser window, click once on share link
Out of curiosity, what is it that makes the web-based workflow more appealing to you as a user? > "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Hanlon's Razor - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlons_razorAlso, while IANAL, that paperwork implied that the company was purchased by Google (at least technically), contrary to what Techcrunch said. Part of my reasoning for not wanting to name the company and founders was this exact reason: it's hard to get a full and complete picture of a complex situation from just one person through a couple sentences.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111114221018.ht...
EDIT: The abstract is available from the publishing journal in the following link. The full text was unfortunately not available without a subscription of some form.
http://jech.bmj.com/content/early/2011/10/28/jech-2011-20025...
My initial reaction to the article was dismissive, but the more I think about it, the bigger the problem seems like it will be by the time it is brought into the public eye. Is a 'bottom 50%er' version of Occupy WallStreet something we could end up seeing within our lifetimes?
Resistance to change can be blinding. I have my doubts that such a service will exist anytime soon, however much sense it might make for their bottom line.
EDIT: this is in reference to TV/Movie industries, where this is much less of a solved problem than games and music.
Also, if living comfortably was a founders goal, why would they start a company instead of getting a steady job working for a comfortable 6 figures at an established company?
> "the judge ruled that the examination of the cell phone was legal because
> police were allowed to survey the impounded car for their own safety, and
> to preserve evidence."
The number of traffic stops where an impoundment occurs is clearly a very small subset of all traffic stops. Shouldn't this be titled 'California appeals court approves cell phone search during vehicle impoundment'?Over the past few years, this has dramatically changed; now I'm friends with coworkers, parents, etc. As my list of friends/target audience changed, the posts I made shifted in nature to stay appropriate to my current list of friends at the time that I posted any piece of content. When Facebook enabled post-specific privacy controls, I made lists and used them religiously for restricting access to content I provided.
However, short of clicking through each and every one of my old posts and changing the access control list or removing the content/untagging myself, how do I prevent the next boss or coworker that I friend on Facebook next week/month/year from easily seeing the dumb shit that I was posting back in 07 when my target audience was other college kids?
What I really wish existed was a privacy setting that allows me to restrict people from viewing content that existed before our Facebook friendship began. If I posted something before I knew you, and before I could account for you being a part of my social stream, it's none of your damn business.
So far the amount of activity has been extremely underwhelming for the node instances, but we'll see if this changes over time. The current total activity amounts to <100 activities per minute, and I'm pretty sure we could support at least an order of magnitude more than that. Each node box has identical state at all times to all of the others, with the exception of currently connected socket.io clients.
Honestly the first thing I would do if we had the need to scale horizontally (scaling only for HA for now) would be to reduce the amount of data sent over the wire at all levels. I'd modify the current solution of sending the entire object to send only a reference to the object and what amounts to a diff of old version to new version.
I'm pretty new at architecting stuff like this (this project was my first time making architecture decisions), so I'm sure there's plenty of room for optimization. I'm just hoping that it was architected in a way such that if/when it fails due to load, very little of the code will need to be rewritten. However, given current performance, the increase in amount of activity that would be required to overload our architecture seems like one of those 'Good Problems to Have'.