1,502 karma · joined May 29, 2023
The biggest barrier to entry for hacking SS7 networks is just gaining the network access. And that gate is often secured with some shoddily written mess of old code.
I remember during Covid there was a few startups in that space trying to work with MVNO’s to get a foothold in the market, but don’t think any of that went anywhere.
In the UK it was famously a cheap lock.
In the USSR, physical control of warheads was supposed to be under the KGB according to some sources.
This actually is a great point. A few years ago when working on a code analysis tool, we mirrored every single WP plugin and let it chew on them for a while.
It used a mixture of static and dynamic analysis, and “kinda worked” to some extent.
It found more issues than we could reasonably handle, and a lot of them were in plugins with maybe two installs ever and that hadn’t been activated in years.
We ran out of beans before implementing a proper triage system that would score the findings based on popularity or “last updated” data.
I may revisit this sometime though, as my ideas on static and dynamic analysis have come a long way since then!
I wonder if I could get a nice flavour profile from using some smoked/toasted (dried) peppers and some untreated ones in a fermentation? Would there be a nice flavour combination of the Smokey and Tangy aspects that I enjoy?
My last efforts at growing my own chilli’s were going extremely well until I went away for a month, forgot to leave instructions for their care, and they died off beyond recovery.
The problems this solves look interesting for a few CLI tools I want to build :)
Technical people will make a recommendation, knowing it’s going to be ignored and that the decisions already been made.
I noticed also that some of the security scanning tools we use “silent fail” on some old appliances because they can no longer negotiate the appropriate SSH connection due to library updates :)
I wish I could replace these old devices, and I recommend to do so, but usually replacing them won’t happen until they physically break.
Think: Industrial IoT devices at client sites and other such security horrors.
I have to maintain a few VM’s and statically linked tools specifically for interacting with old network appliances that modern Linux hosts won’t “talk to” without crippling their SSL/TLS configuration or doing other horrendous workarounds like specific OpenSSL/OpenSSH config files for those things.
It’s actually an interesting problem when performing security assessments - some tools for scanning will have false negatives because they can’t “talk to” old shit.
It will get you a fair amount of the way there, but at some point you have to go and actually do the thing to validate your model.
Doesn’t help that the HAM community will more than happily snitch on you if you goof around too much, and licences mean your full dox are publicly searchable (at least in America).
For example: Glock. You either are carrying in condition one, or condition three.
I’ve not handled or even seen one of these Sig’s yet, so I can’t really comment on them specifically.
Example: https://www.fullspectrum.dev/a-less-suspect-way-to-get-exter...
Memory dumps are obnoxiously useful for detecting stealthy malware, especially if you do the memory dumps from the hypervisor instead of from the VM itself.
The hard part is parsing :)
For example: for years I was using Pythons requests library incorrectly. The way I was doing it worked - but it wasn’t correct.
Once I published a short blog on the correct way - the correct way seemed to stick better in my mind!
Now I’m working through my backlog of drafts, dumping a load of stuff ASAP, and then trying to commit myself to some form of publishing schedule to force myself to “catch up” on the project backlog.