g105b

Hopefully it is just copilot that is dying and not GitHub itself.

Looks really good but it's sad to see something that rules out Firefox. This isn't a jab at you, it's the state of our industry. Still sad though.

This looks really cool. I'd love to read your dev blog if there is one?

I would love more information on your setup. I want what you have, but I've skipped the app release because I thought xcode was required, and last time I used it it hurt me.

I think a few more than 2 people have said that now.

The idea is really cool. I thought the simplicity of the framework would mean there were lots of examples. Well, there are lots. But not one of them is working.

Uncaught TypeError: The specifier “lume-js” was a bare specifier, but was not remapped to anything. Relative module specifiers must start with “./”, “../” or “/”.

SQL named parameters was a feature introduced into PHP on 24th Nov 2005, with the release of PHP 5.1.0.

The author's idea is "A Simple, Radical Idea: Put Consent in the Browser". So when you set up your browser, you get a single choice of whether you want websites to track you and sell your data.

Here's an even more radical idea: the browser doesn't even ask you this, and by default it just respects the user's privacy and blocks all third party tracking.

Can you imagine an internet where the user is put first?

I've been trying to achieve the opposite of this project: render scenes in ASCII/ANSI in the style of old BBS terminal games. I've had terrible success so far. All the AI models I've tried only understand the concept of "pixel art" and not ASCII/ANSI graphics such as what can be seen on https://www.bbsing.com/ , https://16colo.rs , or on Reddit's r/ANSIart/ .

If anyone has any tips for how I could achieve this, I would love to hear your ideas.

I love how you've kept it so simple, but it actually solves a real-world problem. Well done for releasing something!

Whenever Thunderbird makes its way to the front page of Hacker News, I always re-download it and hope that I can use it.

Every time I've ever tried it (spanning around 30 installs over the last 15 years), I've uninstalled within a week to a month, due to sluggish UI, phantom unread emails, crashes, and text formatting issues.

I do it because I believe that one day Thunderbird could be good. Today could be the day - I've installed it, added my accounts, and it looks like the developers have made some significant improvements. I'm not talking about fancy new features, instead I'm talking about the small nitpicky problems I've had whenever I've tried to use it.

For example, this time I installed, I didn't have to go into a hidden settings menu (here be dragons) to make new emails default to the top of lists. My replies are now made above the original message. Fastmail doesn't throw a wobbly when trying to add email, calendar and contacts with the same password.

Maybe today is the last time I install Thunderbird?

I signed up. Every piece of functionality is "coming soon" as far as I can tell. I'm not sure what the purpose of putting it on Hacker News is other than to validate a product before it's built.

"It's not for everyone, but it might be for you!"

I'm not sure if this product's tagline is the best/worst I've ever seen. It sounds like something Alan Partridge might think of.

Nice work. I have a weird bit of feedback - your app isn't drawing the number 4 correctly. Sounds weird but here's a screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/QqKgEBG.png

Please can you enlighten me, I'm a mathematic plebian?

You need 9 more minutes of thought process.

A landing page to a product that has yet to be built.

But it does have 28 5 star reviews.

> Unlike rigid, one-size-fits-all CRMs, it adapts to your workflow, whether you're a solo founder or a growing team. The AI learns from your usage to provide relevant insights and automation.

Can you give some insight into how you've implemented an AI to learn how the CRM is used so it adapts the functionality of the CRM? This sounds magic!

I would like to try it but I don't have a Google account.

Firefox. No errors in the console, no activity in the network tab... just empty white squares and no components on any of the pages.

I don't see any components, just empty white squares.

You're being facetious but I genuinely think it's a good idea to normalise drugs. I believe that part of the problem with drugs is that they're considered forbidden, so if you share my viewpoint then it's not too dissimilar to the problems with social media or other addictive-but-bad-for-you products.

I always found lmgtfy to be quite a passive aggressive move, even though I understood the reason for lmgtfying someone was because they hadn't bothered searching in the first place.

Now, with "let me plex that for you", I send someone a link, the website fills out the question, and forwards to what looks to be a broken website, failing to load anything. Maybe I don't understand the purpose, or the question I typed was not "valid" in some way, but either way (wait for it)... I'm perplexed.

This comment thread is like a Monty Python sketch.

Nice idea and well implemented, but the puzzle seems too hard/abstract for me to understand. I can't really get a grasp of how to convert the first visual that looks like "ponauJ" into something that made sense of "Number two ___". Maybe if you could get the solution once or twice, it would be enough to teach me how to play it?

Cute. I'd like to see a pony page please.

At what point will the dev community stop seeing any Google product as fit for purpose? I've personally been bitten with their services getting killed, seemingly at random.

Looks great but I don't have a Google account, and don't want one. A lot of people on here are probably privacy conscious, and would be put off by the mandatory Google sign in.

Me too. It really crossed a wire in my brain!

I recently built a website using Markdown as the page source, which then uses CommonMark to produce the HTML. I was interested in seeing how different the extracted markdown looked to the original source markdown. It looks identical!