2,010 karma · joined November 8, 2010
"Welcome operative. Your neighbor at 2201 Main is also playing, and is your next target. To earn points, select from the missions below:
(500 points) For each day of the week of 2/24, call your handler at 212-555-1212 [twilio number] and report the time that the target returns home from work.
(1000 points) Your target has left an important clue in his trash. Rifle through his trash midday to find the clue. You will have to determine what it is. When you've found it, mail it to 2222 Anystreet."
Owner of intelligence-agency-for-hire is "determined to remain a player." President/government has a different take on things and attempts to shut down the agency. Agency plants WMDs on American soil in order to distract country and guarantee relevance.
Wait. That was a season of 24.
Oh well. In actuality I'm surprised at myself for being surprised that such outfits exist.
Note that this is very different from the takeaway suggested by the title -- avoid these slides. That may be the poster's opinion, but there is no indication in the article that it is that of the article's author.
Here is the list according to the original source[1]:
1. Paul Graham (@paulg), YCombinator, Essays (97,227)
2. Fred Wilson (@fredwilson), Union Square Ventures, A VC (81,483)
3. Mark Suster (@msuster), GRP Partners, Both Sides of the Table (53,655)
4. Brad Feld (@bradfeld), Foundry Group, Feld Thoughts (38,821)
5. Chris Dixon (@cdixon), Founder Collective, cdixon.org (20,988)
6. David Skok (@bostonvc), Matrix Partners, For Entrepreneurs (14,173)
7. Charlie O’Donnell (@ceonyc), First Round Capital, This is Going to be Big (13,970)
8. Larry Cheng (@larryvc), Volition Capital, Thinking About Thinking (13,215)
9. Dave McClure (@500startups), Founders Fund, Master of 500 Hats (11,127)
10. Ben Horowitz (@bhorowitz), Andreesen Horowitz, Ben’s Blog (10,686)
[1] http://larrycheng.com/2011/01/19/venture-capital-vc-blog-dir...Skok's blog comes in at number 6 on the original list, but has disappeared from the WSJ's list without explanation.
Too bad because there's a lot of great stuff on that blog and the site in general.
In my personal experience nginx+gunicorn turned out to be much easier to deal with than the reference Apache+mod_wsgi. It also seems to be JKM's current preference. Likewise, buildout, while very powerful can be a bit burdensome, and has fallen out of favor relative to pip+virtualenv.
For more current info, check out this extended chat with JKM and other lead Django developers here:
[discuss] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2112160 [direct] http://www.revsys.com/officehours/2010/nov/05/
Note: This video is a dup to http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1830696 though I'm surprised that post only got one point. There are probably others.
Question mark b/c I don't know Scala, but as it is a JVM language my guess is that you would need to know a bit about Java and the JVM to really grok it.
I would have imagined these physical costs to be significant, though not the main or dominant cost drivers.
I would also love to see some numbers.
Update: Clearly ebook distribution has costs that physical book distribution does not. The implication here is that I believe the marginal costs of electronic distribution, on a per-book or even per-title basis, to be minimal relative to physical. But I acknowledge that this too is only in my imagination and not based on empirical fact.
Can anyone explain how this isn't considered price fixing, collusion or otherwise anti-competitive?
My wife: "Yes, much better than forcing the kids to open Dropbox accounts."
(Which I did once, when I needed to share a big file!)
Doh!
EDIT: Nevermind, that was easy.
The observations up front apply to people in general, not just small business owners. People are busy, impatient, prideful, etc.
The recommendations are similarly lightweight. Be attentive, be nice, be patient. K, thx.
According to the site the main difference with premium is that you get access to programs older than two weeks. But there are lots of older programs available both via the web site and via iTunes.
I kind of assumed the premium program was donationware.
He interviews these kinds of people all the time and while the (usually Skype-based) interviews aren't fancy, the content is fantastic. Andrew is a great interviewer and he digs deep into the core of whatever the issue at hand is.