gilrain

> wouldn't it be easy to point me to even one example

Read and think about my wine analogy, if you care.

Point out any wine that doesn't taste the same as any other, to me who has said he cannot taste wine.

Only then, I'll believe you that wine can taste good or bad.

Is my mind open? Is this not a waste of your time?

The downvotes are because you're resisting easily-observed reality with the seemingly-rational response "Where is this 'air'? If I'm breathing it, it should be easy to point to, no?"

No. If you can't see it, and don't understand it's there, you cannot be explained to. You're someone with no palate asking how anyone else can know if a wine tastes good.

Humility is a valuable tool, but it must advertise itself: nobody will believe it of a haughty tone, nor should they.

Maybe skilled work within other fields is more difficult than we imagine based on our ignorance?

Actually and very obviously, what's happening now is new and worse.

Actually, most women don't like being assaulted, regardless of the attractiveness of the assaulter. Additionally, this is true of humans generally, not just women.

It's really gross that you think of women as so alien and inhuman.

This comment is extremely ignorant across several of its statements. Ignore.

> If you think about it, it is weird that they even make articles out of statements that only "may" be true.

I thought about it. And it's very stupid to imagine uncertainty should be off limits. I hope that isn't what you meant.

Why are people so greedy? Why can't they wait to be given something, or remain content without, rather than take from others by force? I'm genuinely curious too.

That's no moon.

Or search engine ads, natch. My eyes rolled out of my head.

Thanks! I had no idea they added a paid option.

This is a brilliant browser for iOS/Linux usage, and now its UI is minimal, and its settings are filled only with stuff for my benefit. It feels like the early 2000s again! This should be much more ballyhooed.

> I have first hand experience.

You can't have first-hand experience of "usually" where that applies to multiple people.

> Chronic depression doesn't usually have a "cause"

Is that true or your guess?

Correct. This is specifically what covered my uses of the service:

> to review your work, to ask questions of, to perform security analysis

It's not a nitpuck to me: reading the comment I replied to, I assumed I needed to cancel my Sourcehut subscription. In fact, I don't. That's a lot of information to've left out of so many pull quotes.

It would be less misleading to also include:

> Moreover, the use of AI for purposes other than co-authoring code, tickets, emails, and so on, is discouraged but not prohibited. If you use LLMs privately to review your work, to ask questions of, to perform security analysis, and so on, and then write original code to push to SourceHut, your use-case is aligned with our policy.

Not really: as far as we know, you use it for nothing; the person you replied to gave examples.

> decided to make stalking DHH into a personality/lifestyle

> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.

An intellectually honest guy like you is probably so furious that DHH makes a personality out of stalking entire peoples. Pathetic++, right? :^:

So, a Linux distribution.

His rhetoric has crossed into the murdery kind, actually:

> When wolves get out of control, you shoot them. When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.

You don't get to make this contrast and pretend you didn't. The only way his rhetoric could be more clear is if he bought a gun and shot them himself.

What are the top 3 you remember? You say you can’t speak for all of it… can you speak for any of it?

> I've made a language learning app for myself. Its working better than Duolingo so far, for me. Its not really public

On the other hand, famine is coming. Come back and read this next year. Was your dalliance worth these food shortages?

I’ve never had an issue accessing necessary services from Linux. Once, literally, I had to use a Chromium browser — but presumably that would have been the case off Linux, as well.

What services are you thinking of that gate at an OS level?

Are you their dad?

Best writer I’ve ever seen not understand writing. Proof positive that you needn’t understand something to produce lots of it!

Then why didn’t the Buddha kill more people, thus removing the cause of their suffering?

Because you can’t remove someone’s attachment to themselves… terminating them isn’t the same thing. What you must terminate can be found only in yourself, nowhere else. And it isn’t your life that you must terminate, but your self.

Get off HN if you care about spirituality.

You asked an LLM to reason about you, for you, and it said you’re an adroit reasoner? It must have context we lack!

> I am currently in consideration for doing this

Try “I am considering”.