48 karma · joined August 14, 2021
Depending on the context, this can traumatize a human though. This idea has been the basis for both gay conversion therapy and applied behavior analysis. The latter I have had the misfortune to directly experience myself.
Speaking from my own neurodivergent experience: I tend to be a bit slower and get distracted easily, but when circumstances are optimal (silent office, clear expectations, etc) I can function on about the same level as my neurotypical peers.
While I don't 'blame' neurotypicals, I do recognize that most office environments are not that accessible for me and other neurodivergent people.
There are more and more cases where my personal experience seems to contradict with science. And I am not sure what to make of that.
I am quite tall, even for Dutch standards, but the hood reaches my shoulder easily. It also drives around quite a busy neighbourhood. So I expect this specific car to kill someone within the next 5 years or so.
I trust the obsidian team, but I don't trust the plugins.
Also your other comments makes me think of the term “sealioning”. Hope this is unintentional.
Just accepting the system and abusing it is not going to make the world a better place. This is why other commenters are upset, as you blatantly abuse immoral structures.
Can you tell me where you have read this?
I have my phone on Dutch so I loosely translated those. Hope it is helpful.
Want to add that I have have used “back in time” for a long time, probably +10 years, recovery has always worked so far.
Only issue is that it does not do block-level deduplication. But it is good enough for my laptop with external harddrive usage.
I have medical reasons. I have autism, and experience has taught me that working 40 hours simply burns me out within 3 months. I usually ask for the 4-days without mentioning the autism. But if they ask why, I won't hide it either.
* blocklist/blacklist, I find blocklist clearer because it does what it says. Same for whitelist
* master/main, same as above, main describes it's function more accurately.
Regarding the genger wording, I have memories as a child where I was confused because for some reason, only the boys where adressed. Not thinking it through, I simply assumed that was intentional. And thus, if a teacher said 'boys, lets go that way!' I would be arguing with the girls since I thought they where not supposed to follow along.
Of course, this is not the case for ALL proposed inclusive language. I simply notice that most of the time, the inclusive alternative is a lot clearer.