232 karma · joined March 25, 2021
But, I hear FCC is orders of magnitude more effective, eg, so maybe a portable massspec is where its going to be?
https://news.mit.edu/2024/researchers-3d-print-key-component...
(
>This work was supported by Empiriko Corporation.
(To abuse a Ridley Scott favourite: slip a Marechal’s baton into his rucksack)
[this is opposite of the Rabinovich “strategy”, which hints that YC are not sociopaths]
EDIT: I dont think this is comparable to Steve Jobs’ 100-Person Retreat without more insider data, e.g.,
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41416275
Would be interested to know if anybody got promoted as a result of these retreats, my hunch is, no, because everybody knows about the 100-person retreat.
EDIT 2: another system to compare with, kind of the opposite of Rao’s model, is the Lambeth race, thats more like openly favouring the tortoise? So that no rabbit would sign up in the first place. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41468567
(Possible case study of a trio of Morlocks’ deplatforming proposal attracting Eloi?)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41470263
PG has already gone all in on repl.it, 10x the sprezz is required for the equivalent NPO (more related dynamicland rants to arrive)
([3],[4,5]) examples of goodfaith sprezzatura might be:
The proximate cause of getting d-v*t’d (or fl****d, or not getting u-v’d even??) in an Apolline chatroom. E.g by forming complete sentences in Lx or Dx, where x>1.62 & D=Domain of “expertise”
Purported sophistry or use of PhrenoloGical instruments to dichotomize founder candidates.
Vapid curiosity: Ben Toner, a researcher in GrIneqs, seems to be a sibling of Helen… peripheral examples of failed attempts at goodfaith sprezzatura?
River of child-shamans vs hemitheutic (Agnes Dei) koinonia (in the context of Ruth) vs goodfaith sprezzatura vs interactive proof (with a canonical role for the sheep in the antimatroidal frame [0-1])
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraiyar#History]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Æsir–Vanir_War#Theories]
[tangential note: antiparallels with outcasting of entertainers in pre-war Korea]
E.g. the various outstanding cricket players of the Raj
Meanwhile can we standardize meanings of various terms — should we use the ancient values for aristocracy,hubris,Metis,techne (my preference)
Thanks to Rao i’m now skeptical of dichotomies as well as direct sums of them. Nevertheless I dont think the social path looks (except superficially) like competition, what you want (individual , or small groups of) scientists to do , is to model other neighboring entities well enough to avoid ret(h)reading the same grooves. Max/min the exploration/resource-usage. “Waste is inevitable. Rivalry (conflict?) is optional”
[ To snowclone Thiel, play chess within, play poker without— but i have not concluded where the demarcation is]
Here I’m glad you considered angles that I did not. Lets play! (Mainly Orwell, the hypernormie reading of Founder Mode)
[2] Collison? Or are confusing irish gingers? There is some subtextual/subconscious overlap with the concept of antiheroism in catholicism —Graham Greene, in particular, maybe Eco,Alasdair MacIntyre (one of your intended audience?), tangentially,..
Prowess. 2 tangential thoughts that you might be able to bring back into the fold.
A: that snowclone from Thucydides sounded familiar, but what I really recall was Brasidas’ un-spartan virtues. I cant find my notes, maybe you can XD. Did he out-Athenate the Athenians? Afairc those unspartan virtues didnt travel well in Sparta even after his death-by-victory.
B: Rao’s hackstability, transmuting sprezzatura into samsara, if not erloesung. Morlocks -> Hacker, Eloi -> the Machine (think temple of Moloch in Metropolis; Mittler ~ James Scott’s metis?
What about the trifecta in Russell’s taxonomy? I’d guess PG et al (Type IIIs) bet on it, but having not read Rao’s Gervais Principle, they had to empirically derive the managerial revolutionistas inserting themselves between the Type Is (where matter = customers as well as cash/the lower levels of the infra) and the Type II “system designers” aka “founders”. The new insight (relative to GP) seems to consist of previously repressed kinship bonds between the founder and the infra. (At this junction I tend to revisit my thoughts about p2p child rearing in the kibbutz)
Now.. back to why prowess is deprioritized in uh silo’d hacker “spaces”.. i’m guessing its hard to converge on a shared metric of prowess across hacker subdomains. Other signals, e.g. lieblingshunde can be more reliable. Post coarsegraining we identify Stanley, but in his day the Londoners, what did they think? Why did his brother support Warbeck??? Further riffing on microlocal banks managing the exchange rate (of talent) based on perhacker PPP (“proven prowess parity”) to be called for…
[1,5]Hmm de wiki for Biche says it was an austrian patrol. She was real family! Proof of fortune. The proof-by-lieblingshund would be legal tender on Sand Hill Rd. Not so much proof-by-sansoucci.
[petit nicolas] You do make me miss the locally-sourced, artisanal, post-talk snacks
[EDIT2-3: looking at the DL bookshelf, the accompanying soundtrack (if i riff from superficially collating memories of certain other bookshelves) would be Sprawl II/Tracy Kidder (now with a stake in Jack Dorsey’s Block.io/Tidal)
“Simulation n its discontents” should be paid close attention, with Freud/Oedipus in the background?
[EDIT] easier for me to sympathize with Hacker > book Jeeves > tv Jeeves. The dot product.. might not be real..
Have definitely also run into the “seasonal farmboy-wranglers” in the Appalachian slopes, but uh i think since the crowd was demographically narrower/less touristy/the local culture more laidback not much wrangling took place.. or rather there was a lot more fiddling with the machines rather than people. (Active skiving)
Its a barbarian taijitu though.. so nominally Han the sword would have been north-made
>imaginary
yepp you can substitute virtual for imaginary
Before you get too annoyed, remember that these 2 (Greer & Farrell) are right of the SV centre. Their analyses would be about as accurate as left-of-SV-centre critiques like Barbrook’s.
I have read about 14% of the canon, and almost all of them honour the (certified sprezzatura-free) elbow grease. PG popularized “schlep” amongst the Sand Hill goyim, after all?
Here’s a post from someone in the centre that was reposted in the last 12hrs, i briefly went over it, and indeed there is a whole lot of coverage on the nuance of “schlep”. Feel free to apply the same analysis. :)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41441422
https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2013/07/10/you-are-not-an-artisan...
[EDIT: i agree somehow (with your hunch? As well as a pinch of old-fashioned hubris) that PG’s unhealthy obsession with Firenze and Wodehouse seems to cluster around sprezzatura]
10)virtual particles have a real effect (re conservation laws, noether, etc)
01) note that mints and mines are pretty much immortal (on the human, if not geologic scale, not even needing basterdized primogeniture?
[ Emmanuel Todd has some theories on how inheritance culture is why old country needs to choose between slavics and teutonics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_the_Empire ])
i seriously doubt anyone has figured out to study how coarse grained institutions should behave, if no professional has even thought of seriously applying expanders to study how they already behave..
However, if your issues are tied to local characteristics, then (in maybe an abstract way) you still have another fundamental obstacle to scalability, not related to compensation..
(FWIW i think an interesting related question is whether YC might be able to scale outside SF if they werent so into the slogan “do things that dont scale” — which i sometimes interpret as the viridical paradox “scale by not scaling”)
So it depends on what you mean by “they”, the company with the old name Kongo Gumi is no longer in construction, but otherwise the company with the new name Shin Kongo is, as a subsidiary of another conglomerate.
Bloomberg also had an article https://archive.is/rLnnH
There’s then also something deeper about making the trade-off between growth(rate) and stability..
OTOH photographer coops are quite common, here is a famous one https://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/Magnum_Photos
[Cue yada yada the batman snowclone “live long enough”, eg you either die a batman or live long enough to become Batman)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_(military)]
[another source of hypernormie pro weirdos, from my personal anecdata, are psychiatrists, im guessing the sibboleth is the high neuroticism to __ ratio, which comes off as wisdom (after discounting for age).. weird pronormies would then be econs profs? This is prob why both trigger the So[Ha]Ri(veign/vian) Taleb lol]
Also should have replied to alephnerd in a more timely fashion
(Sorry, kinda replying to the below as well)
Great for the SF6 to supercritical CO2 transition (which hitachi is already helping china with) https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/02/1103398/greenhou...
> Uses in magnesium, aluminium, and electronics manufacturing also hastened atmospheric growth.[10] The 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which came into force in 2005, is supposed to limit emissions of this gas. In a somewhat nebulous way it has been included as part of the carbon emission trading scheme. In some countries this has led to the defunction of entire industries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_hexafluoride
I could go on about what the long term solution is but who wants to hear rants from a kiddo ;)
“Creating” is a vague(r) term, do you mean “quantization”? Afaik the open-loop geometry of fermions is something any quantization scheme has to start with, the details are how one includes gravity, so without more details, one wouldnt be able to tell how LQG is different from string theory :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakamura_Shaji
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_companies
(Of course, since wiki page hasn’t been updated for the first, it might also have quietly passed into the ether)
(Lagniappe: attendee could be a wiktionary-approved contronym)
https://www.soa.org/4934ee/globalassets/assets/library/proce...
Possibly Hessean (Nietzschean, even), that swimming in Der Teich is quite contrary to survival..
(But not “immortality”?)
Survived nearly 1500 -> Nearly survived 1500
Compare with Aaronson-Carroll-et-al p5 properties of c-sophistication..
Prigogine 1980 Ch5, peddling copium in the form of Lyapounov functions to the Chinese ? (Wouldnt have found that without your tip!)
(Personally, i increased my weights for IRP having stolen Dennis Gabor’s quote, especially since it was re-liberated by an actuary)
All mutterings from SFI are in scope, haha
How have kernel devs (lkml data) or apache devs (your anecdata) been (ab)using the Fehmi principles? Any new insights from your taykh (fishing?) escapades?
[Swiss hydrogen storage using iron as catalyst keeping kosher, but that stainless steel tank isnt lol]
hinting that something different is happening here (from the C&L model mentioned below.)
Indeed the CS guys are probably looking for a way to redefine entanglement (entropy, as you summarized above), to essentially “work” in the same way as what they have in their preprint, but also cover the prethermalized cases..
Well, if your not being facetious— you should be familiar with the recurring institutional failures in the old country? MGM, Leggett, Geroch might have been fine in their salad days but as they got on, nothing really diffused to their squads.. As it is, Ole Peters is having difficulties defending himself against serious charges (from the orthodox econs) of unfamiliarity with Jensen’s inequality..
The TCS horde is routinely cleaning out the institutionalized physicists these days, from what i can see its due to effective horizontal virtue transfers from the european/pure math community. Wont be long before the econs suffer the same, seems like they are walled up in the same old way.
it does look like UK physics education today is in pretty ok shape compared to the others. i will assume from now on that the Research Institute (featured in the amazon adaptation) was created by american refugees.
[One might have to selectively apply MGM amnesia to MGM’s own teachings.. ]
Aaronson-Carroll’s quest (and indeed Kolmogorov, Prigogine, AND MGM’s ultimate quest (ergodicity econ))
is to move BEYOND what you just quoted of MGM.
(So that old teaching which you had for decades kept in cache is an instance of MGM being correct in a boring way)(you might have been paying attention to my attempts to draw out experts recently?)
[i get why experts on quests prefer to stay silent on HN, so, dabblers, blowhards, and cranks are acceptable]