496 karma · joined February 2, 2025
Which theorem are you trying to prove?
Still waiting to hear the security concerns.
Reputation vs harm ethics.
> I’d also argue that it just means that Facebook was very successful at following all the trends
Yeah foreseeing and executing on those trends is the hard part.
And from a runtime perspective it’s going to be a struct with perhaps more padding. You’ll need more details about your specific threat model to explain why that’s bad.
GCC probably has a better justification than “we are allowed to”.
I think the metaverse imagery you are referring to was about 10 years ago.
I also had a math professor who believed in extreme differences within the research community. He said only a top advisor would actually be engaging with real research and be able to bring you with them.
> More likely, get stuck a postdoc.
I still can’t understand why the outcomes for math Phds are so bad. They have extremely general intelligence which is applicable to any jobs I’ve had. I think it’s some combination of being unable to sell, unable to explain what they do, and still having their aspirations defined by professors.
Every strength is also a weakness. Small groups like that can also very effective because their trust runs deeper than work. The real lie is that thousands of unrelated strangers trying to get paid will have each other’s interests at heart.
You are spreading misinformation.
I already agreed with the correction - he has voting control.
What is still incorrect is imagining that billions of dollars gets you advisors who know how to run a company - and those people aren't just high level executives already running companies.
> you're deep in it with your belief that Zuckerberg is an unusually capable operator.
The burden is on you to show a successful CEO for over a decade is actually an idiot.
> hire top-tier advisors
The circle of top-tier leaders who know how to manage giant tech companies is a tiny circle with Zuck being one of them.
In fact that’s what the board of directors did - they used their money to hire Zuck to run their company.
I also think your description applies well to many startup founders.
1. there exist other ways to represent an integer
2. An old computer uses a different representation
3. numbers are displayed in base 10 on my monitor
4. when I type in numbers I don’t type binary
5. twos complement is confusing and unintuitive
6. it’s more natural to multiply by 10 when using base 10
7. I’ve used 32 bits to represent other data before.
Why is the age such a talking point? An insight in startup culture is that the public underestimates young people, especially when it comes to business skills with objective results and tight feedback cycles.
It just seems like now that HN is skewed older we no longer believe that?
I didn’t say affecting - I said limiting the power of.
A regulatory procedure the president is asked to follow is different than saying “we made this information off limits”.
> President is is legally permitted to ignore laws against raping
That’s been beat to death. He would face impeachment + removal from office.
No I’m arguing that they are under heavy scrutiny from the media - it’s very difficult to get any work done publicly in that environment.
> this article speculative.
Other comments have addressed the possible usage of this tool. The connection is dubious.