108 karma · joined April 27, 2010
Point taken, though, that it is difficult to suggest books in a scenario such as this.
I don't know much about journalism - but whatever it is, I hope its not this
I'm sure you've got a deluge of requests already. Kudos for your offer. Like someone here mentioned, marketing is probably the single biggest hole for hackers hanging out at HN - so its heartening to see someone offering fill that gap.
Just wrote you asking help on http://recruiterbox.com
From what I understand, YC encourages its startups to focus on a specific/core problem - which might misunderstood as thinking small. But thats exactly where large opportunities can be found.
Also, obviously big ideas (that all agree will show big growth & big exits) will also be heavily competed by existing established and entrenched players with a lot more resources (not to mention, other startups). If VCs ignore YC (and others like it), they do it at their own disadvantage
Also agree with the "getting involved with real users" point. One of the ways to achieve this is to build and market for smaller firms - these tend to operate less bureaucratically, and also have a good chance that the buyer and user is same. This also allows for the software to be built in a more organic manner - the most crucial aspects first and then features that are incrementally useful.
1) Tech startuppers are tech savvy. They also tend to have strong opinions about stuff.They write/blog/tweet/comment a lot. Adds to the general noise around startups.
2) Possibly, noise about why startups rock helps reduce insecurities for some. It probably helps, given that startup life can be hard.
3) Nothing wrong with people trying to do their job well. Just that discipline, integrity, hard-work are less glamorous than a "brilliant idea that changed the world". Fact is, any successful startup needs discipline, integrity and hardwork - multiplied by two.
4) The opinion of a .NET programmer (irrespective of what he/she earns) matters. Especially, if its about .NET programming. Or about a product that I'm making. But I'd take his/her opinion on general startups less seriously.
5) I don't live in the US. Where I live, there isn't too much hype around startups. Indication that it might be a SV or US only thing.
6) I'm an accidental startupper. I landed here by simply moving away from jobs I didn't like. I haven't done very well (yet), but I'm happy with what I'm doing. I'd do it again. May be there's more to people starting up than hype. May be it has to do with (sic) the joy of creation. May be it has to do with the kick of having a large population use something you made. May be its a drug :) Who knows
My email's on my profile. Guess we can try a trial meet if we can have (at least) 10 guys turn up. And then see if it catches on.
Its something I've wondered about. What would stop Google from degenerating? Its an interesting question because the reason we use Google (good search) is not how they make money (ads). They are related, but not the same. If you have a product that people buy, you have to keep making it better.
So what stops google from splashing their entire page with ads (to earn more), or not being the best in search (as long the ad revenue is flowing)? I think the author gives a good reason why google wouldn't do that -> because users will easily change their default search engine