Joking aside, not a bad bet.
783 karma · joined April 12, 2008
Joking aside, not a bad bet.
They are navigable by canoe by design, yet they are flitting dots.
It gives me pause; what is this site trying to convey? It's a fantastic effort, yet for the water we have, it doesn't match.
[1] https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/watertrails/interactive_map/inde... [2] https://www.paddleplanner.com/tools/maps/bwcaqueticomap.aspx
2013: https://greedehumidifierrecall.com/ProductEntry.aspx
2023: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2023/Gree-Recalls-1-56-Million-...
EDIT: The story does include both links, but "four more people have died" doesn't read like a link containing the latest models.
It's worth watching developments in Jupyter QtConsole [https://blog.jupyter.org/jupyter-qtconsole-4-4-81f2eaad5706].
Ctrl-C escapes insert mode, and does not check for abbreviations. It has a different behavior.
<Esc> or CTRL-[ End insert or Replace mode, go back to Normal mode. Finish
abbreviation.
Note: If your <Esc> key is hard to hit on your keyboard, train
yourself to use CTRL-[.
If Esc doesn't work and you are using a Mac, try CTRL-Esc.
Or disable Listening under Accessibility preferences.
i_CTRL-C
CTRL-C Quit insert mode, go back to Normal mode. Do not check for
abbreviations. Does not trigger the InsertLeave autocommand
event.
https://vimhelp.appspot.com/insert.txt.htmlhttps://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/unix-linux-appleosx-bsd-ssh-ad...
You'll still need a password manager to store the unique passwords for your services.
https://www.yubico.com/support/knowledge-base/categories/art...
https://www.yubico.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Yubico_Whi...
EDIT: Explanation
Not only was collecting the data time intensive, but determining the feature ingredient(s) was a challenge.
While on a personal level you can fix this by using a password manager and generating another random string as an answer, other cute and terrible implementations like United[2] (calling you guys out) obliterate it, making yet another, terrible, horrible, no-good secondary protocol.
Why companies use them is because the Powers That Be(TM) believe it to be a secure protocol. They localize the problem to themselves and since they haven't been exposed using their mother's maiden name, it's good enough. Also, everybody else uses security questions, even our competitors, so we have to be at least as secure as them, right? The key phrase is "at least". Then you are equivalent in policy and protocol; certainly not more secure. :D
[1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/the_curse_of_...
https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/account/enroll/default
Derp.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/06/how-i-learned-to-stop-wor...
[1] https://www.nccgroup.trust/us/about-us/newsroom-and-events/b...