1,011 karma · joined September 15, 2016
Imagine you're a startup trying to compete with Netflix, and on top of having to create your business and media content, your customers have to pay their ISP a fee to access your website (or have better bandwidth, or have it not counted in your allocated data plan). No one would be able to compete with them. Now replace Netflix with any <Google, Facebook, Uber, any incumbent really>... and yeah you get the idea.
The main reason I've heard for using Angular 2 at my work is that it's made by Google, but it's not like they use it themselves. I don't see how that's a good reason. On the other hand React is being used in production right now by some of the biggest companies of the world.
There's no silver bullet of course, but usually a company should strive to have a mix of both experienced and less experienced workers. Less experienced workers cost less and will be more willing to "deal with bullshit", but more experienced workers bring knowledge with them that can prove invaluable to a company. They've lived through different situations, and they've seen success and failures. Finding the good balance depends of each company's situation of course.
I shiver at the thought of having to cross any of these if there was only a yield sign. The principle that I have priority is not important enough over not getting hit by a bad driver.
TL;DR: I agree 100% with your point, but I do think bad drivers should be taken into consideration.
It's a fact of life that there are no perfect jobs, and the difference between happiness and soul crushing is often about how you can deal with the negative sides of your job.
There are no perfect jobs, so you have to find one where you'll be able to live with the downsides. Is having no career progression a downside you can live with or not? How about having to do lot's of overtime? Or being underpaid? They are all questions only you can answer.
What I learned is that sending emails and not getting treated as spam by any of the big email providers is an absolute mess of tinkering and hoping it'll work. Not all of them would categorize our emails as spam, but Outlook.com started doing it out of the blue, and even a year later we didn't have a clue as to why or how to make it stop. Support for email senders is as good as for users, meaning getting anything else than a canned response wasn't happening.
Dynamic imports is pretty huge too, that should come in handy for a lot of people.
Also, the stock market historical average of annual return is 6-7%, whereas it's lower for real estate. As with anything, diversification is the most important point.
Not all suburban cities are equal either, some makes it possible not to have to commute by car (at least near where I live).
EDIT: thanks for the correction, it's meetup.com not meetings.com
More recently, they started allowing private practice but there are rules for how much time a doctor can work vs in the public system. Tbh I'm not sure I how stand on it, it's a complex problem with many variables. The only thing I'm sure of is your wealth shouldn't affect your chance of living or dying, and for that we're better off with a public system. Should a private system also exist in parallel? Time will tell I guess.
It's really a personal experience, I know myself I don't feel like my life is missing anything even if I'm putting money aside to my future. I'm still traveling at least once a year, and I eat pretty good food all the time. At the same time, I don't have a car and rent one whenever I need one.