this is why, for example, foreclosure evictions often involve the sheriff's office - the county is protecting their own property rights. also, mineral rights, right to dispose of hazardous waste, etc etc
34 karma · joined July 11, 2012
this is why, for example, foreclosure evictions often involve the sheriff's office - the county is protecting their own property rights. also, mineral rights, right to dispose of hazardous waste, etc etc
you are a tenant on the land, and your deed says this. the county is the owner.
you are a TENANT.
before downvoting me, go and look at your deed. find the term "owner" anywhere on it.
yes folks, the county has permitted you to enter into an agreement to make improvements on the land and resell that right to others. the county "owns" the land. most first-time home buyers are surprised to find out that they actually are only considered tenants
this was a common refrain of slave holders - it was a pure market mechanism, the buyer and seller agreed on a price, why does the govt care?
check it, i am certain you signed something like this
i never log in to my bank, broker, or anything else i deem worthy of security from my phone. i never used any of the apps from the banks or the brokers, which is good, because many of them were eventually found to have numerous obvious security flaws
maybe one day the phone will be the default trusted access portal, but thats a long way off, and i am waiting for all of you to help expose the flaws with your own personal data before i take the plunge
my haskell is faster than python and more expressive. therefore you should stop using python immediately, right? of course not, because anyone using the shooutout to make sweeping generalizations has of course read the massive disclaimer warning against that...
numerous resources for your reading pleasure
california is riddled with civil servants making six figures in retirement, i can assure you that they rationally understand that this is far preferrable to having last month's computer on their desk
i don't buy any of the "IT lifecycle" arguments wrt apple equipment here either. for a massive govt contract like the state of california, the vendor is almost certainly required to replace any faulty equipment upon request...from the govt's perspective, reliability is simply a cost issue for the vendor themselves, not the buyer/govt
so apple basically just took itself out of govt procurement