henlobenlo

99% of people have zero epistemic foundation for any of their views so debated on the facts mean nothing

If you know the difference between 4.5 and 4o, it'll take you 20 minutes max to figure out the theoretical differences between the other models, which is not bad for a highly technical emerging field.

This court decision seems insane, being illegal because you work hard to become the best.

You are definitely not a layman if you know the difference between 4.5 and 4o. The average user thinks ai = openai = chatgpt.

Whats the problem, for the layman it doesnt actually matter, and for the experts, its usually very obvious which model to use.

This is the "anyone can be a mathematician meme". People who hang around elite circles have no idea how dumb the average human is. The average human hallucinates constantly.

That's why the whole concept of rights is completely useless. It has no real metaphysical bearing and people just use it as an ever expanding wish list. There are only values and morals that arise from the synthesis of values and truths.

These articles are so dumb; of course higher p/e implies growth, the only interesting question is if the growth is real. Plenty of articles like this came out when Nvidia hit 1T, then 2T, then 3T. If there's interesting insight then bet on it, otherwise it's clear theres nothing of value to be said.