hiepler

Thanks, appreciate the thoughtful feedback.

You’re right that the commit history doesn’t fully reflect the raw development process. I did some cleanup and squashing before publishing, since this is an open-source project and I wanted the history to be readable and reviewable.

I do use coding assistants as part of my workflow, mostly for iteration speed and boilerplate, but the architectural decisions, evaluation logic, and compliance mapping are intentional and manually reasoned through.

Happy to clarify any part of the implementation or assumptions if something looks odd.

Fair point

The name is meant literally as “EU conformity” (EU + conform), not “you conform”.

I was aiming for something that signals regulatory alignment without sounding legal-heavy, but I get how it can read differently.