hitarpetar

> Killing people I don't like is ok

it's so sad that the allies killed so many Axis soldiers in WW2 right? wasn't very nice :(

it's Francoist Spain. people were imprisoned for much less (hence the molotovs)

I don't think it's crazy to assume a post on anthropic.com is marketing

there is no "real weather". the rain is the weather. the map is not the territory. these are very simple concepts, idk why we need to reevaluate them because we all of a sudden got really good at text synthesis

do you find a 40-60% failure rate fits your definition of correctness? I don't think they really needed to spell this failure out...

https://www.salesforce.com/blog/why-generic-llm-agents-fall-...

I guess it depends, can you tell the difference between a weather simulation and the actual world?

the way the pro nuclear crowd talk you might think they are a persecuted religion actually

> This is going to make storytelling very expressive.

finally! we should come up for a term for this new tech... maybe computer generated imagery?

an effective apology establishes accountability, demonstrates reflection on what caused the problem, and commits to concrete changes to prevent it from reoccurring

they don't

lots and lots of things are theoretically possible

thank you, I literally can't read

I get it but it's sort of a strange thing to ask people to accept no?

like asking people to accept that 1+1=3. or that the day after Monday is Thursday. maybe that's the real function of these hoops -- selecting people who are good at doublethink

if your best argument is just "Google it" I'm gonna go ahead and assume you don't know what you're talking about and are just making an appeal to authority

my point is, clearly there is a sense of liability/responsibility/whatever you want to call it. not really the same as selling rope, rope doesn't come with suicide warnings

do you know what happens when you Google how to commit suicide?

this gets brought up a lot, and the reality is that the scale of Amazon's losses is completely dwarfed by what's going on now

red herring. just because some jobs are bad (maybe shouldn't exist like that in the first place) doesn't make this movement humanistic

what about training?

I'm sure it feels that way to you!

yeah yeah I got that I'm just confused what justification your graders gave for rejection. I've never heard of a paper rejected on account of grammar

did you mean to leave this under your own comment?

what's the point of this comment? you just wanted to share your disdain for these titles?

this has the makings of a quality copypasta

no. read the code before you check it in. don't rely on your chatbot to explain it for you

programming languages are deterministic

> there is no reason to expect it won’t get to that level.

that's not an argument. that's just magical thinking

you don't understand it or you don't agree with it?

what do you mean your assignments were rejected? like rejected for being AI generated?

we get it, you hate people