1,951 karma · joined January 3, 2019
I made a game for my daughters 3rd birthday, recorded some Blipi and Coco Melon songs off youtube that I put in the game. I would not have the right to sell the game without securing rights to the songs (unless I want a lawsuit on my hands).
If you want to pay more, the fucking pay more, you are free to give the IRS more. I don’t understand why anyone, ever, would be in favor of more or higher compulsory taxes.
1998 called, they want their phone back.
In seriousness though, you could have used black electrical tape and saved yourself the nauseating smell of nail polish.
No shit, they have huge teams and this is their bread and butter. I have 3 people. I do know my stuff, which is why I would never use KVM and try to match that to the features VMWare gives me with a team of 3 (including myself).
Major cloud providers have huge teams developing their compute as a service, that is what they do, that is the bread and butter.
I don't have the resources and team size to hack our own hypervisor/on-prem cloud solution.
I have a team of 3 people, that is it. I can't put 5 people on designing and maintaining a hodgepodge solution of various tools that get us to where vmware already has us. I need a turn-key solution that a small team can manage.
KVM? Not even close, you need a host of other tools to get what you have with esxi and vcenter. You’ll spend months just finding and configuring a disjointed hodgepodge of tools to get what you could have setup in a day. And even then you have a fargile system that is likely to break any time you update one tool in your stack.
Which astrophysicists? What percentage? This is vague hyperbole trying to dismiss a theory many respected astrophysicists take seriously. This reads like a scientific hit piece, and not a honest review.
This a rather false conclusion. I will concede wealth alone isn’t a predictor of weather someone is likely to commit crime. But, being able to generate wealth on your own is. The example of winning the lottery doesn’t prove much, since that person got lucky, they didn’t generate that wealth on their own. If you can’t generate your own wealth legitimately, then you will be tempted to do illegally, winning the lottery doesn’t change that, you got lucky once, but you still don’t have the skills to generate your own wealth legitimately.
Might have been a quicker, easier "fix".
* Monday: Run 4 miles
* Tuesday: 1 hour strength/weights, 20 min on stationary bike (6.2 miles)
* Wednesday: Run 4 miles
* Thursday: 1 hour strength/weights, 20 min on stationary bike (6.2 miles)
* Friday: Run 4 miles
Saturday/Sunday, nothing strict, might do a short run, otherwise hanging out with my family, or doing house work.That is quite the opposite of “simple”. That is in fact, overly complex and engineered.
Well duh. This isn't really an argument. This is one of those "facts" that is so obvious, yet people think it should be somehow shocking, like "90% percent of accidents happen 5 miles from the home", well no shit, you have to drive in the 5 mile radius to go anywhere, or to get back home.
> A family that makes $200,408 gross taxed at 18.38% is still left with $163,573. A family making $12,439 @ 9.78% only has $11,223 where every dollar counts in terms of trying to keep a roof overhead and bellies full.
And...what is your point? This is perfectly reasonable. Look generally speaking (of course there are outliers and edge cases), but the more money you make the more responsibility you have. A line cook doesn't have as much responsibly as a franchise manager, a franchisee manager doesn't have much responsibility as corporate district manager, etc. Why would anyone strive to have jobs with more responsibility, if you are just going to tax them to oblivion where a senior VP now takes home the same as line cook? Having the senior VIP take home much more money, is reasonable and fair.
Ideally taxing income is generally immoral, IMO. A much fairer system would be to ditch income tax entirely and just have a VAT. But somehow people are deluded into thinking VAT is "regressive", which its not.
This kind of assumes some stuff that might not be true.
1. The database is some open source project like Postgres or Mysql and you can easily grab containers for it from dockerhub.
2. Somewhere in the code there is a schema file for the database (assuming it is a db that has schemas) so you could at least init a local copy of the database schema (although it wouldn't have any data in it, you would have all the tables) in your docker-compose setup.
3. Once you have the app and the db in docker-compose then come up with a way to seed the db with some dummy/test data (not a full dump of the real database, as you mentioned it is quite large, just enough data where you can see things working in the app).
You do that and show your manager, and they will quickly start throwing more stuff at you. You will also gain a reputation as some who takes initiative.
Good luck.
How do you manage multiple instances of the application and not introduce split brain?
> Or you could do it at disk level (RAID).
That is not comparable. RAID's redundancy is not the same as the redundancy in a multi node database cluster. You have one service, not multiple services, network card gets fried, your database goes down, you can't promote a standby to master and be on your way. Also RAID is a single disk as far as the OS is concerned, so you could hit I/O limits (especially if you have a single binary) that cause your app to chug, you cannot split your writes and reads across different physical or virtual machines that have different disks.
>Instead of deploying a web or game server that sits in between your clients and your database, your clients connect directly to the database and execute your application logic inside the database itself. You can write all of your permission and authorization logic right inside your module just as you would in a normal server.
Why? Databases should never, ever, ever, be used to perform logic, they are datastores, that is it. Your logic goes elsewhere. Stored procedures are the worst "feature" of any database, you are just asking for a hard time debugging, troubleshooting, and increasing the chance that you will fuck up the most valuable part of your system, your data.
> This means that you can write your entire application in a single language, Rust, and deploy it as a single binary.
It also means you have a single point of failure, no read-replicas or redundancy. Hate everything about this.
And yeah, God forbid you move from something with more flexibility and freedom (a combustion engine), to something with less (an EV).
I don’t wish anyone ever go from more to less freedom and flexibility.
The “derp it’s only 20 min to charge” is a bad argument. You are asking me to go from 2 min or less to 20+ min. That’s a 900% increase and is totally unacceptable.
Oh it's so easy and convenient!
You are being short sighted, yeah in ideal conditions, it's OK. But what about.
You're pulling into your home just about on empty, plug it in walk inside, then a get a phone call from your dad who lives 2 hours away "Mom just had a terrible accident, and is in the hospital, were not sure she can make it, get to the hospital as soon as your can!" Now your dumb ass has to sit and panic and stress while you wait for your stupid EV to charge. On top of that now your playing this guessing game, "What is the least amount of charge I need to get to the hospital, what if I underestimate just a bit and run out of charge 10 miles out, then I would be even later than if just let it charged a bit more".
What if you car is low on charge, you go plug in it, then a storm comes ripping through, electricity is out, it's out for days, your fucking stuck, sorry.
I think people are vastly under estimating the "I HAVE TO LEAVE RIGHT THE FUCK NOW" value you have with a combustion engine.
Emergencies happen, electricity goes out, I would happily pay more for a vehicle that didn't have these terrible drawbacks.
EV’s will never be a viable option until they are better in every facet than a combustion engine.
The charging is cumbersome and much longer than filling a gas tank, hard pass.
I would buy a combustion engine car, even if it was more expensive, for this reason alone.