211 karma · joined May 8, 2019
I would guess that this change will be rolled back in the UK as soon as it becomes legal.
[0]https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-laws-to-boost-br...
[1]https://theconversation.com/why-uk-approach-to-replacing-the...
The most recent examples of individuals being fined have been fines around €200 [0]
[0] https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=ANSPDCP_(Romania)_-_Fine_...
Then that would be a legitimate interest, and you could store that information for a period of time that is reasonable for processing refund requests.
But you would be barred from using that same information for a different purpose, e.g. the loyalty program.
GDPR article 25 requires systems to be have privacy built in, so a system such as the one you describe where a separation of these concerns is impossible, would probably itself be in violation of the regulation.
Fixing such an issue should be top priority, and in the meantime, you would revert to pen and paper accounting to ensure the correct release of each prisoner.
We have the option to reject certain EU-rules, and can negotiate special exemptions into our agreement. Norway has some exemptions in fishing rights that are central to our agreement. Under the previous government we also rejected the EU Postal Directive, though the current government has since accepted it.
> [W]hen a suspect in an interrogation told detectives to “just give me a lawyer dog,” the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that the suspect was, in fact, asking for a “lawyer dog,” and not invoking his constitutional right to counsel.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/11/02...
Personally, I would pay 25$ out of my own pocket for this app, but not if I have to ensure that the notes are not related to my work, only to my personal life. And with my personal projects I use similar technologies as I do at work. Should I then not look at the notes when at work? It is just to complicated to live up to the terms of the license.
> The use of OBSIDIAN for the exercise of your own trade or profession (...) does not qualify as personal use.
I would interpret this to mean that I as a developer can not use this to exercise the "trade" of software development. That would in turn mean that I can not use this to make notes of stuff I learn on my own time, if it is related to software development.
I would imagine most people not caring about this kind of license limitation, but it would be interesting if it was intended this way, or if this is just me being bad at licenses.
That's quite a long wait for this update.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_dom...
I think that's a bit harsh. It's an article explaining simply, but effectively why you should probably not use toString(). Just because something can be summed up in a sentence does not make it a waste of time.