2,417 karma · joined October 3, 2019
Just suggesting to a mathematician to dissociate with their collaborator for a follow-up work, because their collaborator “is inappropriate to author OpenAI’s work”, is completely against the norm of mathematical research. As charm137 puts it in a comment below:
> This is like a researcher from CMU saying to an NYU researcher that their collaborator, being from MIT, is a problem - this is as ridiculous as that!
https://x.com/sama/status/2097385167002415140
https://x.com/SebastienBubeck/status/2097379411691516310
A wake up call for using OpenAI models. If you discover something with their model and you work for a competitor, they “felt it would be inappropriate” for you “to author OpenAI’s work”.
https://x.com/sama/status/2097385167002415140
https://x.com/SebastienBubeck/status/2097379411691516310
A wake up call for using OpenAI models. If you discover something with their model and you work for a competitor, they “felt it would be inappropriate” for you “to author OpenAI’s work”.
I’m not talking about the Feb number that is reported in March.
NewPipe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47020218
PipePipe: https://pipepipe.dev/
As recommended by https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47021252 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47020412
I haven’t used any of these alternatives myself.
BTW, I notice that both of your complaints will be addressed in the next version:
https://github.com/typst/typst/pull/6672
https://github.com/typst/typst/pull/6442 , see also https://laurmaedje.github.io/posts/math-mode-problem/
Social biases are subjective. Facts are not.
https://www.quora.com/Mathematics/What-do-grad-students-in-m...
> a bit like trying to explain a vacuum cleaner to someone who has never seen one, except you're only allowed to use words that are four letters long or shorter.
> What can you say?
> "It is a tool that does suck up dust to make what you walk on in a home tidy."
From https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp
> Cost of goods sold (COGS) refers to the direct costs of producing the goods sold by a company. This amount includes the cost of the materials and labor directly used to create the good. It excludes indirect expenses, such as distribution costs and sales force costs.
So the $550 or $650 COGS includes the cost of labor for manufacturing, but excludes (say) marketing and auditing costs.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-xiaomi-says-activ...
> Chinese newspaper Economic Observer earlier reported that local traffic police had told the father of one of the victims that the car had caught fire after hitting the cement pole, and the car key had not unlocked the door.
> When the app is opened for the first time, it waits a few seconds to call the geolocation API. This way, the App Store’s automated review process doesn’t see anything unusual in the app’s code. We also checked the app’s behavior by running it through a proxy to fake our location to San Jose, California. For this location, the app never reveals its hidden interface.
> After Apple approves the app with its basic functionalities, developers use CodePush to update it with anything they want. The app then reveals its true interface in “safe” locations.
https://old.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/1f2suin/cosmic_alph...
I can recognize all other flags: EU, Australia, US (sorry Canada), Hong Kong, African Union, but not South America.
Hong Kong flag for Asia is why the flags caught my attention :)
https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1b5s32x/the_case_agai...
You may also read other discussions by the author and others at the Reddit post:
https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1b5s32x/the_case_agai...
A few Reddit comments appear to agree at that non-mathematicians (e.g. amateurs and game programmers) use geometric algebra non-rigorously.
I suspect the issue is not about mathematicians who know how to be rigorous. Both posts are complaining about how mathematical outsiders are using and teaching geometric algebra non-rigorously.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39576214
> even by the 90s/00s, GA had gotten a bad reputation because of its tendency to attract bad mathematicians and full-on crackpots
> those reasons disproportionately attract people who are not actually capable of rigorous mathematics, or are slightly prone to conspiratorial thinking, or are otherwise slightly deranged
> if you look around for papers that explicitly talk GA, they are very disproportionately (a) non-theoretical, (b) poorly-written, (c) trivial, i.e. restating widely-known results as if they’re novel, (d) only citing other GA papers, and of course (e) just plain crackpotty
PaperWM (Gnome) https://github.com/paperwm/PaperWM
karousel (KDE) https://github.com/peterfajdiga/karousel
niri (wayland) https://github.com/YaLTeR/niri
hyprscroller (hyprland plugin) https://github.com/dawsers/hyprscroller
hyprslidr (hyprland plugin) https://gitlab.com/magus/hyprslidr
PaperWM.spoon (MacOS) https://github.com/mogenson/PaperWM.spoon