HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

hmmSceptical

-2 karma · joined June 4, 2023

submissionscomments
hmmSceptical··on WFH – Watched from Home: Office 365 and workplace surveillance creep (2022)
Comparing a research role in mathematics vs "boxing a big shipping co" is not the same.

Its reasonable to expect a research mathematician to output 0-1 result a year, packing 1 box a year at "big shipping co" is not "reasonable".

You reframed my entire argument about low skilled / measurable "output" jobs back into the "creative" realm, which i've said isn't as easy to measure.

hmmSceptical··on WFH – Watched from Home: Office 365 and workplace surveillance creep (2022)
> Goalposts

You literally said "output" the most speculative / vague definition of "work" available.

I appreciate programmers / "creatives" "output" is much harder to measure, but there are alot of jobs where "mouse moving", "words per second" is a very reliable indicator of "output".

hmmSceptical··on WFH – Watched from Home: Office 365 and workplace surveillance creep (2022)
> In the case of programming...

A percentage > 90% of the world isn't programmers...

There simply isn't the same workflow to monitor "word" / "pdf" documents without an insane amount of effort / document control that most SMB's dont have.

The only option available to them, without hiring programmers, is often only the metrics that get offered built into these types of products.

I dont think that's a strawman argument.

hmmSceptical··on WFH – Watched from Home: Office 365 and workplace surveillance creep (2022)
"output" only matters if your company is paid by "results" and isn't based on billable hours, otherwise ... "output" doesn't matter.

Law firms would love every case to be solved in 2 hours if they still got the same $ value from a case that dragged on for 6 months.

hmmSceptical··on WFH – Watched from Home: Office 365 and workplace surveillance creep (2022)
> Bad businesses will continue to use draconian methods to try to squeeze productivity rather than foster it

What about jobs that aren't creative like coding or graphic design?

Some jobs are simply "sit in your chair and do work". The productivity metrics aren't speculative - they are measurable.

You may argue "these are jobs for AI" - but realistically alot of jobs are a way off from this.

Why shouldn't the "productivity" of these staff be measured? Because you don't like it?

If you work at "big shipping co" and "box" 1 item a day and your colleagues do 100, should you not be fired?

hmmSceptical··on Ask HN: A programming language designed to be generated by GPT?
People get PHD's in designing programming languages / compilers.

GPT models are at least 5/10 years out from critiquing the choices those "very smart" people make.

Even when they do, we'll need to critique their critiques - I wouldn't worry about learning any language now :)

hmmSceptical··on Reverse Engineering Self-Supervised Learning
You what?

It may be like that on modern captcha mechanisms, but that was not how we got here (I.E "The vast majority of computer vision training images come from self-driving cars’ cameras").

Are you to young to remember when captcha's were based on Googles/others scans of books?

For like 10+ years the baseline was "handwritten" digits / "book text" and how well models could identify them...

Google spent millions on fighting lawsuits over this... I think you must be young (not that im insulting you, just that im showing my age and im < 30)