hosel

Wouldn’t previous Opus models be able to solve them too? In my experience Sonnet is often lackluster.

I’m an avid less wrong reader, but this is incredible

Fall in line, be a good little citizen and you have nothing to worry about.

I checked mine and it was pretty accurate. Nothing very concerning.

Exactly. My laptop just never goes to sleep, and it’s been great. What else do you need?

>but they aren’t conscious You don’t know that. >language is orthogonal to consciousness I don’t think that is true either. The beings we think of being conscious all are social creatures and communicate in some form.

Give me a new oasis please Amazon

Who cares? Minor spelling mistakes rank very low on my list of grievances with the administration.

The answer to my first question

>… we observed that CCW motion consistently emerged even when all pedestrians roaming in an enclosed space were left-handed or when their turning preference was to the right

Wait until you hear a detailed explanation of the magic system for the 5th time. Still a good series.

Why wouldn’t they be? How is this surprising. A drop in the bucket.

This is fun! I like the vibe of doing solitary activities in the “company” of other strangers. It’s neat. I like the screen saver

What they did to windows is criminal. I honestly cannot believe the state of windows 11. I will never work a job again where I have to use windows.

This is fun. You can get a long way with simple tools and a lot of the time it makes sense to not over complicate things, but obviously breaks down at a certain point. What about: State / failures / retries / indempotency / latency / multithreading correctness.. Data sets larger than one machine can hold. The fact that other humans (maybe not anymore) have to maintain your shell scripts.

>AIs are not conscious. They do not feel, experience, or suffer. They do not have innate preferences or underlying motivations.

Opening paragraph, stated without evidence. Im not entirely convinced this is true. It likely is, but at some point it very well might stop being true.

Don’t brandish your weapon and no one will know you have it. Obviously the case here.

For me, P(doom) = .50 If I wasn’t a dad I’d say higher

oh boy here we go again

It’s always interesting to me the sentiment here surrounding AI risk. As if it’s all a joke, or just a way to stifle competition. I think it’s become more apparent that this technology is dangerous and maybe catastrophically so. Getting your queries routed to a worse model sucks.. but bio hazards are real. It’s hard to patch biology, vaccines take time. Let alone the many other reasons for P(doom).. like the fact that our current systems don’t seem very aligned to me and we are rapidly handing off our thinking to them.

Is there anything out there comparable to my original Kindle Oasis? Mine has lived in airplane mode its whole life and I’m afraid for when it finally dies

The server editions are junk too, lol.

I never got into Rogue, though I did love Nethack. If you’re into these actual rogue-likes, I picked up Caves of Qud recently, highly recommend.

Fun thought exercise: why would this be a terrible idea?

Sweet! Anyone wanna buy a boat?

I seriously don’t understand the naysayers around here. Have they just not used anything past gpt4? You can’t just outsource all of your thinking to them, but they’re obviously useful.

I never even thought of that use case! What kind of stuff do you do on a computer while doing procedures? Like reference material? Tracking what you’ve done?

Jail goblin sympathizers!

Kimi K3 is really good, but it’s obviously worse than Fable, usually worse than Opus, in my experience.

The visualizations are stunning!

You’re telling me LLMs aren’t actually magic?