I think that that was the implication. We should elevate the standard for new chemicals that might enter our body through the environment to a similar standard we already have for drugs (chemicals we deliberately put into our body.)
744 karma · joined March 1, 2016
Come to think of it, I wonder if it's for the same thing that gets people to refer to Google Assistant/Siri/et c. as 'she'. I've noticed that a lot also.
"Hi?" "We?" You are a piece of software. There is no "we" here. I can't even begin to express how infantilizing that sounds to my ears.
Anyway, I didn't last long on Windows for that laptop. /rant
Look, we can just disregard The New Yorker entirely and the UX will improve.
See now that is interesting because I've never seen that movie, but I guess it's not just me who can see the connection after all.
I agree with you though, it definitely fits into Lou's general theme, so it could just be a coincidence after all.
I've considered filing a FOIA request about them but can't figure out quite what I'd be asking for. Data retention? Frequency of queries? Efficacy?
Completely OT: I absolutely know what you mean, but ugh, corporate jargon.
I'll agree with the word choice of 'insipid' however...
Not sure if that was intentional, but nice.
I didn't even know there could be such a thing as a nuclear startup. How do you think they will succeed if NuScale didn't/couldn't? Or was NuScale mismanaged?