575 karma · joined August 4, 2015
And white supremacy is more authoritarian than libertarian. And it's not conservative in the current political sense and it's populist.
I'm not sure what to make of that Twitter link except that there's a whole bunch of folk so embedded in their own political bubbles that they're incapable of communicating with anyone beyond.
Yes, it's a stereotype, but not an arbitrary one - and no less absurd than a bearded man blowing a kiss.
Or maybe it's just a silly logo that's not worth deconstructing.
Truck attacks, drone attacks, knife attacks - one might be forgiven for thinking these objects have developed minds of their own.
Or perhaps the insinuation is that most humans themselves are mere instruments of the cultures and institutions they're embedded in.
Louis XIV: "I am the state." US Constitution: "We the people...secure the Blessings of Liberty"
That's no cosmetic difference.
To address the idea of white privilege directly: - It's increasing racial awareness and conflict. - It's a blunt instrument that doesn't take into account the myriad of circumstances each individual faces (such as financial wealth, mental health and physical height).
To provide a counter example to parent's, I'd rather be a rich ethnic minority unfairly stopped by a cop, than an ethnic majority person living in a trailer park and addicted to meth. The ethnic bigotry in this example isn't excused, but it's not the main concern.
Perhaps, all else being equal, one could argue that 'white privilege' matters.
But all else will never be equal. And the one place where equality really matters, it already exists - the law.
Notions of privilege could at least attempt a full accounting at the individual level, rather than dictating in broad strokes.
Slave labor was only one component of practically all great countries/empires. The West was the first to outlaw it.
The US in particular was built upon the hard-earned lessons of the past, including the moral worth of individual liberty.
Macro-history is fundamentally about the rise and fall of civilizations - the undesirable elements of this are consistent, but Western tradition and enlightenment has also given us democracy and science, and put us in a collective position where we are so relatively prosperous that we can look at the past with an inflated sense of shame.
And as a broader point, it also might be worth considering how Western society stacks up against all other societies to ever exist.
But history is littered with turbulent times, and compared to those times the present is a pleasant dream. Whether it turns nightmarish remains to be seen.
The earth itself has no moral view on what should happen.
A better example would be European nations like Hungary, which have reinforced their national identities in the face of the recent migrant crisis.
In the US, the 1st Amendment expressly prohibits this kind of authoritarianism.