778 karma · joined January 1, 2023
So the idea that the law actually exists, and we just have to find it, doesn't seem correct. Given that judges were usually barristers before, it's more like: one barrister confidently argues that the law has always been X, the opposing barrister confidently argies it's always been Y, the former-barrister confidently argues that it has always been Z - and that one always wins.
Humans are also found to be more complex/intelligent/sophisticated than was thought, given AI goalpost moving.
Of those 1.2 million orbits, how many are dangerous?
It's more that it diffuses evenly rather than having a specific direction.
Next smallest is picometers, 1000pm = 1nm
"cheap and powerful enough that individual researchers can muck around with it at home" seems a pretty good measure of this, because of the explosion in width and pace of experimentation.
A downside is you lose the thread if you skip exercises (e.g. do alternate ones) - the exercises are an integrated whole. But it's a lot to do all of them.
I hadn't gotten the impression that these helped show why exactly the axioms were choosen - though could well be there and I just didn't see it.
Historically, automation creates more work than it replaces; but why should that continue? One reason is that automation is a commodity, so competition shifts to non-automated functions. Human demand continues.
Of course, this doesn't address the non-economic concerns of the Luddites, that the human investment in skills is lost, and the derived sense of human value and dignity. Unfortunately in the long-term: whatever your labour, AI is coming for you.
Present LLMs are glorified search. As they approach real-time training, Google will go away, finally disrupted. (Google's 20% time was meant to avoid this very thing, but you need a whole organization behind an idea to disrupt, however small: e.g. IBM's PC developed in startup-like separate business unit.)
What currently connotes newness? Or is the present age so dystopian and pessimistic that we lack one?
BTW: I think time not doing exercises is just as important; it's when your mind tries to piece together the data. Coincidentally(?) time resting, after physically exercising, is when your muscles strengthen.
Elon does the same externally ("visionary") - and I expect internally.
learnt from https://jamie-wong.com/2016/08/05/webgl-fluid-simulation/#im...
the elegant lightgl.js, which is an abstraction layer on top of WebGL that makes it much nicer to work with. Unlike THREE.js, it doesn’t make any assumptions about you wanting any concept of a camera or lighting or that you’re working in 3D at all.In a study, post-menopausal women weight-trained, giving 40% increase in bone density.
The inactivity of "retirement" kills. Use ^ lose.
In a study, post-menopausal women weight-trained, giving 40% increase in bone density.
The inactivity of "retirement" kills. Use ^ lose.
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work. You have to start over with a working simple system. - Gall's LawIt's easier to keep working, but I do my best thinking during a nap.