3,065 karma · joined November 25, 2009
she/her
Wet wood is just SO viscerally unpleasant to me!
Source: my ID.4
All I can say is I've never seen any issues on the LRT. I'm genuinely sorry you have.
Which Minneapolis very much does not have right now despite the best efforts of one or two plucky underfunded nonprofits.
If your light rail cars are the best option people have, that's not an issue with the transit design, that's an issue with the rest of the infrastructure
Frankly, it's intimidating, and I don't blame people for not opting out even assuming they know that's possible
They're not! It's actually a great UX!
But this really is a bummer -- they had admirable goals, and I know lots of people who ended up there and who enjoyed it a lot.
2021: low frequency pulsed charging: https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/451327786/C5.pdf
2024: high frequency pulsed charging https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aenm.202400190
Not up to really reading them right now, but this is a pretty neat area of research!
If you're going to use this feature, always check the citations.
The Python logo has been blue/yellow in the modern era and monochromatic prior, but the Python IDLE icon DID used to be green[1]. Which in practice probably cemented into my brain very early on, since I learned Python with IDLE!
[1]: https://github.com/certik/python-2.7/blob/master/Lib/idlelib...
You COULD do dangerous things, but it's not like the LLM is constructing code it runs on its own.
You're referring to Megaupload, which is entirely different despite the name similarity.
Which it seems like AMD is interested in from the slides in [1]
[1]: https://community.amd.com/t5/business/empowering-the-industr...
> Much to my surprise, astrologers had very low agreement with each other on the chart for each person. If astrologers picked charts at random, they would agree with each other 20% of the time. In our study, even the most experienced astrologers only agreed 28% of the time.
The CPython JIT is a newer and less invasive technique called copy-and-patch[1]. It's a lot less powerful, but a lot easier to plug into an existing language implementation: known sequences of python bytecode are mapped to templates of machine code
It's a very "not ready for primetime" feature