iamdelirium

I think you're overthinking it.

They've been releasing their models 2 weeks after the first announcement. I doubt Google is timing their GA against Anthropic unless they had knowledge of when exactly Anthropic was releasing theirs.

Also, I've been using Carbon vs Opus 5.5 and Carbon is a great model. Haven't seen any hallucinations. Argon was well known to be a worst programming model than Opus via benchmarks, so you and influencers broadcasting a well kept secret.

Yes? I regularly use Argon in agy on my Google One subscription.

I still find Opus 5.5 way too dense. MUCH better than Opus 5 which was unreadable.

Even the Plain English hack only is a temporary solution.

FrontierCode 2.0 is such a poor benchmark for Gemini since it's the only model forced to use Devin CLI while other models get to use their preferred harness.

I wonder why that team singles Gemini out like that.

This does not mesh with other battles like Arena where Argon is nearer to the top.

No, GCP has been selling Anthropic models for a while (and soon to be OpenAI models).

That's generally how models are made. There's several candidate checkpoints and experimentation going on.

GCP has been hosting Anthropic models for a while.

GCP already hosts Anthropic models so probably trusts and lawyers.

I mean, Haiku < Sonnet < Opus < Fable/Mythos makes just as much sense. They're larger and larger works.

I wonder if releasing this soon sort of validates the rumor that Sol 6 was just the Terra model they bumped up and slashed the price.

Then Opus 5.5 caught them off guard and now they're actually releasing the correct sized model.

You mean the president than literally ran on "lock her up"? That's the victim here?

Stop trying to both sides this.

I wonder if this is going start being abused soon.

If I was Palantir or any other GOP aligned company, I would be completely against this. What's to stop a Democratic president from doing the same thing and destroying them?

This is not even true. Gemini Spark has been there for a while.

How can you say that when a Flash model is benchmarking close to Opus and Sol?

No, it's the same internally and externally.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a pretty great model IMO. You shouldn't compare it to Opus, Sol, K3, etc since it's a much smaller model but it's a little better compared to Sonnet, Luna or Terra, etc.

Gemini sets alarms for me in Android all the time via voice chat all the time. Did you give it permission to interact with the apps?

This isn't true?

San Francisco is consolidated in 1856 and according to Wikipedia, a century before Nashville (1963).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco#cite_note-Coy_19... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nashville,_Tennessee

"we have no moat, neither does anyone else." is just an employee's personal work blog

3.1 Pro has the same Jan 2025 knowledge cutoff as the other 3 series models. So if 3.1 has it in its training data, the other ones would have as well.

Don't be evil was never removed. It was just moved to the bottom.

https://abc.xyz/investor/board-and-governance/google-code-of...

The secret is you are probably worth MORE than $14/m in ads.

I haven't had a comment generated for 3.0 pro at all unless specified.

This is provably false. All it takes is a simple Google search and looking at the ARC AGI 2 leaderboard: https://arcprize.org/leaderboard

The 17.6% is for 5.1 Thinking High.

This is easily shown that the numbers are for GPT 5.1 thinking high.

Just go to the leaderboard website and see for yourself: https://arcprize.org/leaderboard

They're testing in Denver and NYC so its coming.

Because the number is model generation.

Sorry but the fact is a government agency (the FCC) pushed for this. This is a completely different thing than Disney deciding to do it on its own.

This is a 1st amendment issue.

Sounds like SEALs all right.