The AP _hated_ us but they had a multi-year contract.
2,432 karma · joined August 8, 2014
The AP _hated_ us but they had a multi-year contract.
No mom! I'm afraid of heights!
But anyway, I won't buy a vehicle with a subscription based feature list that isn't something like a concierge service. If it's in the vehicle, I've already paid for the gear. (This changes once there's a community of moto hackers that can disable the lockouts... ish)
My wife would move us there if housing wasn't an issue, so I've had this conversation.
Do you have a support team that shares the load with you? We don't have anyone we can rely on. My in-law that does fly out sometimes would rather play with their phone than be a grandparent and we can't trust them to so much as drive a dog to the vet because we're sure they'd get distracted or lost or just crash.
Kids are a ton of of work. Life is a ton of work. Combine those two things and have no "village" to speak of and it's often too much. There's no pop psychology needed to point out that for many people, kids aren't their best life. Kids aren't always rewarding. Sometimes the right answer is the easy answer: if you don't want kids, having one will not be a net positive for your life.
I wouldn't choose to be a mom in this world. They're far too underappreciated.
Every use I can think of around "blaze of glory" is about dying in a gun fight. I'm reading this as a threat.
> in this case the person had to submit evidence of their innocence to amazon by way of other Camera's. what if no evidence had existed to refute the drivers claim?
Amazon is not a right. If they couldn't prove it wasn't true, Amazon doesn't owe them anything except possibly a refund on the smart devices (I could see that).
I checked and they don't validate card information, which is at least something. I didn't bother to look at what the site is doing because if the fake info I put in was flagged, I would have already known. I assume they're collecting and storing contact info.
My ISP can do what they want with their equipment but I prefer anything inside my firewall to not phone home.
> The amount of personally identifiable information stored by SamKnows is limited to; name, email, and address. All metadata and personally identifiable information is both encrypted at rest and in transit on SamKnows servers. It is never stored or transmitted to or from the test agent
See? Nothing to worry about, just your name, email and address. Very little that could actually pinpoint who you are or where you are.
This is probably less common with people who go to church in holidays only. The devout are different.
For instance, maternity/paternity leave. If you give someone full leave, one could argue that it's a benefit only afforded to FTEs and that could be enough to convince the local business office that the person is, in fact, an FTE. Now you're in violation and have to pay fines as well as setup a local office of one, who will never visit said office. So you do the proxy office thing, which incurs cost right away. Come tax season, you have to figure out what you owe based on the person and your new legal status as a for profit business in the area. Your cost to operate has just become significantly higher. Now you have to rethink the position and location and a non zero number of these will result in closing the local role and having to let someone go. Lose lose for everyone. The alternative path says "no baby leave because you're a contractor." That sucks too because you like the people you hire and want to do right by them but that also means keeping them employed.
You can find alternatives and that's not a literal situation but it is the combination of a few situations into one example, so the contents are real but not as a single tale. (I don't want to tell anyone's specific story.)
Global remote hiring is hard.
Big companies can afford the investment into many small locations and they can afford having the regional expertise to avoid running afoul of local and federal governments. In an ideal world, we'd make this easy for ourselves but the world is not ideal.
FWIW, password reuse with MFA is not actually that much of a problem any more. Neither is rotation (which was show to be a net negative). There's a whole set of NIST guidelines on the topic.