As I said, I like LibreOffice, but the UI needs work.
2,562 karma · joined March 3, 2008
As I said, I like LibreOffice, but the UI needs work.
For some of the popular mining cards (e.g. RX 470/80), well they simply haven't been available in many places for over a year now. Their successors aren't that great for mining either because of the increased power usage and RAM "lottery" (you don't really know what type of RAM you're getting when you buy a card). But most gamers don't generally care about RAM speed. This is also why the 5 series is generally cheaper than the 4 series (where you can find them).
However, the biggest problem is that there simply isn't enough RAM. The RAM shortage is being driven by smart phone and GPU production, and suspected price fixing. Samsung said they plan on increasing production (apparently they don't like it their competitors who make inferior RAM are making similar profits), but we will probably only see the effect mid-2018.
https://www.dramexchange.com/WeeklyResearch/Post/2/4815.html
http://www.pcgamer.com/samsung-to-increase-dram-output-as-ra...
http://www.dwa.gov.za/Documents/Policies/nwpwp.pdf
But as it says in that document - it's National Policy. The government will need to make the call. There may well be provision for disaster areas, but the government doesn't think CPT qualifies.
On the second point 4, there's a already a health concern with regards to our current water supply. Cracks in pipes in the existing infrastructure allow impurities to enter our water supply. When the pipes are at full pressure this doesn't happen. However, when the pressure is dropped (as what is currently happening in various suburbs), the pressure is not enough to keep these impurities out, and you end up with a contaminated supply in some areas.
- Umberto Eco, on Social Media
Depending on how you view the world, this can seem like pretty much a very obvious statement. Before mankind there was no "value". We invented it, and it evolved with us. At some point it even became self-referential ("I am valuable now because I become even more valuable later").
Other side-channel attacks can come in the form of analysing network data, power-consumption (CPUs use more power when they are "busier")... even noise (listen for when the fans start spinning up).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar
The interviews with him about this are on Youtube.
So either, the US government knew about them but didn't tell the Pentagon; or the Pentagon had no such program; this program was meant to spread misinformation; neither the US gov nor the Pentagon ever had any evidence of UFOs.
As an experiement, go on to a site like CoinMarketCap. Click on BTC->Markets. Sort by price. It looks like a ton of arbitrage opportunities, right? Well... now try to take advantage of it.
Interesting letter. I am aware that there was resistance from certain figures because of its portrayal of Yau Shing-Tung, but I had no idea Richard Hamilton sent them a letter about it (it's been 10 years since I read this article).
However, IMO the piece is still worth reading (along with the objections...) in terms of how it gave exposure to solution of the Poincare conjecture.
edit: Heh... it seems I should have followed the developments more closely. It turns out the Cao–Zhu paper was revised that same year:
> On December 3, 2006, Cao and Zhu retracted the original version of their paper, which was titled “A Complete Proof of the Poincaré and Geometrization Conjectures — Application of the Hamilton–Perelman Theory of the Ricci Flow”[2] and posted a revised version, renamed, more modestly, "Hamilton–Perelman's Proof of the Poincaré Conjecture and the Geometrization Conjecture".[21] Rather than the claim of the original abstract, "we give a complete proof", suggesting the proof is by the authors, the revised abstract states: "we give a detailed exposition of a complete proof". The authors also took out the phrase "crowning achievement" from the abstract.
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/116627/useless-math-that-...
I'm not saying that this is the same of Mochizuki's work, but I would not dismiss it solely on the basis that it's "useles".
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/08/28/manifold-desti...
It even has a Wikipedia article on it:
Yes, exchanges support real-time trading, but not every company has all their models running in modern paradigms. It's not uncommon to find companies that run multiple VMs for the sole purpose of... running Excel calculations. Yes, this is exactly what it sounds like. A server that has a several, multi-meg Excel files in memory with external APIs that plug values into cells and read outputs. As I said, within the grand scheme of things, for sports who still run on legacy models, this is a major bottleneck. Remember, many of these companies were started in the 90s, and that's when these models were created. The people who created them are usually swallowed up by the financial industry and now come with a hefty price tag. So the question for the business is "Do we spend millions recreating these proven models and run the risk of them failing? Or do we simply just add another VM?"
At my company things have slowly started changing, but the new models (written in F#) still need a lot of work.
1. Highly domain-specific legacy pricing model running on... Excel spreadsheets. These present huge performance bottle-necks and aren't easy to migrate.
2. Reliance on 3rd Party data. Did a scout just send incorrect data? Did their device disconnect? Did they rollback the wrong information? Is the source lagging behind the TV/online feed? GGs. Suspend the game and refund bets.
The tooling really isn't that important. Scalable software can be written in any software, and while some languages do make things simpler, often you can just also find a suitable paradigm (or middleware) that can provide similar advantages. Having said that, we do make extensive use of RabbitMQ (which is written in Erlang) in our environment. I suppose this is also just an example of my previous point though...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_for_drug_tr...
SELECT json_extract(RawData, '$.sourceId') SourceId
, json_extract(RawData, '$.messageId') MessageId
, json_extract(RawData, '$.message') Message
, json_extract(RawData, '$.message.parties[0].name') Party
, json_extract(RawData, '$.timestamp') Timestamp
FROM RawFeed
JOIN Source
ON SourceId = Source.Id
WHERE Source.Name = 'Foo Company'
ORDER BY TimestampSo, you don't ask what they did or why they did it. You ask about topics that they may have led them to doing something that they did. Better still, don't ask. Lead the conversation in a way that will make the question will seem more natural.
Then you respond with something like:
"Wow! How on Earth did you handle that? (Impressionable) If that were me (Empathy) I would have [something outlandish]!!! (Weakness/Ignorance)". So now you seem relateable, and somewhat flawed, even moreso than they themselves. Often, they will try to "teach" you about why your reaction is bad, and what a better reaction would be - often with a "real life" scenario as an example.
"Aaah! That's pretty smart! (Impressionable) But I'm not sure I'd be able to handle it as well as that (Weakness)"
From here they feel they are in a position of power. Especially if you seem more impressed by some more arbitrary aspect, than concerned about the more obvious implications (Weakness/Ignorance). They often open up more about other things they've done, which may or not be related to the original question. But you're still gaining their trust. Eventually you subtly stopped being impressed by what they are saying. And this is just by body language, not words. Your eyes don't light up when they are "expected" to (Impressionable). You don't smile wryly before they end their sentences as if to say you know you know where it's heading (Empathy).
The other person starts thinking:
"Why is he/she impressed any more? Is it because they're really that ignorant? Or maybe what I'm saying isn't really that impressive to them? Perhaps I should fill in more details, and maybe I'll tell about some other thing I did"
Now I'm not saying this will work interviewing terrorists/criminals. But this has been my own experience for as long as I can remember. People tend to tell me their darkest secrets (even without me asking) within about 30 minutes of meeting me for the first time, especially when alcohol is involved. I rarely ask directly. People just end up telling me things.
So to answer your question, you could potentially use your old PC to host your POS wallet and earn ETH. The amount you will earn will depend on how much you currently have and how long your are connected to the network.
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc
That's usually fine for the bigger, more established alts (since the known alts use the known algos - DaggerHashimoto, Equihash etc), but not for the alts which can potentially generate the most profit in shorter periods of time. So if a coin that uses some obscure algo gets pumped for a few days it's going to skew the chart.
The real benefit of Nicehash is that it's more accessible for people who are new to crypto mining. If you work out the numbers, mining ETH (for example) directly is almost always more profitable than using Nicehash. Nicehash is just simpler and more convenient.
Suppose there's altcoin called ALT which can be mined very quickly and is worth let's say $0.00001 per coin. Mining a block takes 5 minutes and the payout is 10000 ALT coins or whatever. The 10000 coins are distributed across the pool, and you determine that on your setup you should be able to mine $3 USD in terms of BTC a day on the pool. You get wind that ALT is about to get pumped hard, which means your potential earnings could reach $20 per day (or whatever).
What's the problem (ignoring exchange fees) with going "all in"?
Firstly, ALT coin may have a confirmation time of several hours or even days. You can't sell unconfirmed coins.
Secondly, the exchange has to sell these coins elsewhere (usually another exchange). Because of the low value, this other exchange may have a rule that you can only sell in batches of 1 million. So even though you've mined X amount of coins, you still have to wait for the batch to be fulfilled.
Thirdly once the batch is fulfilled, you still have to wait for it to be sold on the other exchange.
And finally, the BTC <-> ALT exchange rate may fluctuate independently of known factors.
By the time this happens, your ALT coin will almost certainly be worth a different value to what they were when you first mined them.
It could be worth more or less, but the point is you can't efficiently forecast on most alt-coins when you use exchanges like Zpool and NiceHash. This is why they usually have several values for your "earnings" - Total, Unconfirmed, Confirmed, and Sold. It's also why "profit switching" algorithms and techniques are kind of a silly idea for most alt-coins - you cannot calculate profit based on current market values.
I used zpool.ca for a while when Blake2s alts were highly profitable. I don't know what the best alt-coins are these days. It tends to fluctuate quite rapidly.
https://github.com/clangen/musikcube/issues/120
That section of code should be refactored though.
And before you ask, I'm actually not only preparing the issue details, I'm looking to fix it myself.